Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34309570›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2021

Candidemia Risk Prediction (CanDETEC) Model for Patients With Malignancy: Model Development and Validation in a Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Junsang Yoo, Si-Ho Kim, Sujeong Hur, Juhyung Ha, Kyungmin Huh, Won Chul Cha

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Deep Learning for the Early Diagnosis of Candidemia.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2025
    Article
  4. FromFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Junsang Yoo *Department of Nursing, College of Nursing, Sahmyook University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2331-7644
Si-Ho Kim *Division of Infectious Disease, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7763-8940
Sujeong HurDepartment of Patient Experience Management, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1335-576X
Juhyung HaDepartment of Computer Science, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6596-5116
Kyungmin HuhDivision of Infectious Disease, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5140-3964
Won Chul ChaDepartment of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2778-2992
Samsung (South Korea) · KRIndiana University Bloomington · USSahmyook University · KRSamsung Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAppropriate empirical treatment for candidemia is associated with reduced mortality; however, the timely diagnosis of candidemia in patients with sepsis remains poor.

objectiveWe aimed to use machine learning algorithms to develop and validate a candidemia prediction model for patients with cancer.

methodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective study using the cancer registry of a tertiary academic hospital. Adult patients diagnosed with malignancies between January 2010 and December 2018 were included. Our study outcome was the prediction of candidemia events. A stratified undersampling method was used to extract control data for algorithm learning. Multiple models were developed-a combination of 4 variable groups and 5 algorithms (auto-machine learning, deep neural network, gradient boosting, logistic regression, and random forest). The model with the largest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was selected as the Candida detection (CanDETEC) model after comparing its performance indexes with those of the Candida Score Model.

resultsFrom a total of 273,380 blood cultures from 186,404 registered patients with cancer, we extracted 501 records of candidemia events and 2000 records as control data. Performance among the different models varied (AUROC 0.771- 0.889), with all models demonstrating superior performance to that of the Candida Score (AUROC 0.677). The random forest model performed the best (AUROC 0.889, 95% CI 0.888-0.889); therefore, it was selected as the CanDETEC model.

conclusionsThe CanDETEC model predicted candidemia in patients with cancer with high discriminative power. This algorithm could be used for the timely diagnosis and appropriate empirical treatment of candidemia.

Indexed as

candidemiadecision supportdecision support systems, clinicaldevelopmentinfection controlmachine learningmodelprecision medicinepredictionrisksupervised machine learningvalidation

Identifiers

PMID34309570
PMCPMC8367162
OpenAlexW3187063758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.