ArticleMicrobial genomics2021
Prediction of prokaryotic transposases from protein features with machine learning approaches.
Article in Microbial genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A stacked ensemble classifier for the discovery of prokaryotic efflux proteins based on sequence information.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Single-cell transcriptomics across 2,534 microbial species reveals functional heterogeneity in the rumen microbiome.Nature microbiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identification of prokaryotic transposases (Tnps) not only gives insight into the spread of antibiotic resistance and virulence but the process of DNA movement. This study aimed to develop a classifier for predicting Tnps in bacteria and archaea using machine learning (ML) approaches. We extracted a total of 2751 protein features from the training dataset including 14852 Tnps and 14852 controls, and selected 75 features as predictive signatures using the combined mutual information and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithms. By aggregating these signatures, an ensemble classifier that integrated a collection of individual ML-based classifiers, was developed to identify Tnps. Further validation revealed that this classifier achieved good performance with an average AUC of 0.955, and met or exceeded other common methods. Based on this ensemble classifier, a stand-alone command-line tool designated TnpDiscovery was established to maximize the convenience for bioinformaticians and experimental researchers toward Tnp prediction. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of ML approaches in identifying Tnps, facilitating the discovery of novel Tnps in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.