ArticleActa ophthalmologica2022
Effects of femtosecond laser-assisted trephination on donor tissue in liquid interface as compared to applanated interface.
Article in Acta ophthalmologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Keratoplasty: A Narrative Review of Technological Evolution, Clinical Evidence, Implementation and Future Directions.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- In vivo keratotomy by mid-infrared femtosecond laser resonant with amide vibrational mode.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Femtosecond-Laser-Assisted Liquid-Interface vs Vacuum-Trephine Keratoplasty: A Comparison of 2 Different Techniques - Retrospective Data Analysis.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Femtosecond laser-assisted corneal transplantation.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the effects of femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty using a liquid patient interface (L-PI) as opposed to an applanated interface (A-PI) on graft quality and functionality markers.
methodsPressure measurements during femtosecond laser-assisted trephination were performed using two groups of 10 porcine eyes. Trephination was performed either in an L-PI or in an A-PI setting. Pressure sensor needles placed intravitreally continuously recorded intraocular pressure during trephination. Twenty paired human donor eyes were used to test the morphological quality of donor tissue after trephination in L-PI and A-PI settings. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans were performed before and after trephination. Images were processed using ImageJ and pixel
resultsDuring trephination, pressure measurements with an L-PI were significantly lower than with an A-PI (p = 0.0121). Mean pressure during trephination was 78.1 mmHg ± 37.6 mmHg with L-PI and 188.6 mmHg ± 17.7 mmHg with A-PI. Trephination in A-PI produced a significantly larger increase (p < 0.00001) in donor pachymetry than trephination in L-PI. Significantly lower areas of Descemet folds were achieved in L-PI trephination than in A-PI trephination (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in circularity between A-PI and L-PI (p = 0.27). Total time required for trephination was comparable between L-PI and A-PI (p = 0.45). Time taken to reach working vacuum was achieved significantly more quickly in L-PI (p < 0.05).
conclusionFemtosecond laser-assisted L-PI keratoplasty appears to be a promising method to decrease stress to donor and recipient tissue during femtosecond laser-assisted trephination. Results showed favourable donor tissue morphology markers after L-PI trephination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.