Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34309132›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2021

Information, deliberation, and decisional control preferences for participation in medical decision-making and its influencing factors among Chinese cancer patients.

Lin Xiao, Meifang Peng, Yawei Liu, Lili Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Information, deliberation, and decisional control preferences for participation in medical decision-making and its influencing factors among Chinese cancer patients.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lin XiaoEvidence-based Nursing and Midwifery Practice Center, School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Meifang PengDepartment of Medical Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Yawei LiuEvidence-based Nursing and Midwifery Practice Center, School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Lili ZhangEvidence-based Nursing and Midwifery Practice Center, School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Southern Medical University · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-centred care should strive to respond to the individual patient's needs and preferences when possible. Yet, preferences of cancer patients for participation in different stages of the medical decision-making process to increase matching of preferred and actual participation of the patients in decision-making are not well known.

objectiveThis study aimed to determine the level of information, deliberation and decisional control preferences in decision-making practices among Chinese cancer patients and to explore their association with the sociodemographic and clinical variables of the patients.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted involving a convenience sample of 328 cancer patients from three public hospitals in Guangzhou, China. The Patient Expectation for Participation in Medical Decision-making Scale (PEPMDS) was used to evaluate information, deliberation and decisional control preferences of the patients. Binary logistic regressions were conducted to determine the association between sociodemographic variables, clinical variables and preferences of the patients.

resultsMost patients reported a high preference for information (73.2%) and deliberation (73.8%), while a small number (37.2%) reported a high preference for decisional control. Younger patients and patients with higher levels of education were significantly more likely to have a high preference for information, deliberation and decisional control. Patients with low annual family incomes were significantly more likely to have a low preference for decisional control.

conclusionPreferences of patients for involvement in different stages of decision-making practices could vary. The level of preferences appears to be related to the patient's age, education level, and financial status. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Healthcare providers should tailor the participatory approaches of patients considering individual preferences for information, deliberation and decisional control during medical decision-making. PATIENT CONTRIBUTION: Patients participated in the survey and filled in the questionnaires.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPatient PreferenceChinaClinical Decision-MakingCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingHumansPatient Participationcancerinfluencing factorsmedical decision-makingpreference

Identifiers

PMID34309132
PMCPMC8483183
OpenAlexW3186576601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.