Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34308827›Full record

ArticleBJPsych bulletin2022

Prescribing antipsychotic medication for adults with intellectual disability: shared responsibilities between mental health services and primary care.

Carol Paton, Ashok Roy, Kiran Purandare, Olivia Rendora, Thomas R E Barnes

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych bulletin, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Carol PatonImperial College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7756-1031
Ashok RoyCoventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8432-981X
Kiran PurandareImperial College London, UK.
Olivia RendoraRoyal College of Psychiatrists, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7843-3426
Thomas R E BarnesImperial College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2324-656X
Imperial College London · GBCentral and North West London NHS Foundation Trust · GBCoventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust · GBRoyal College of Psychiatrists · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

methodWe conducted a secondary analysis of data from a Prescribing Observatory for Mental Health audit to assess the quality of requests from intellectual disability services to primary care for repeat prescriptions of antipsychotic medication.

resultsForty-six National Health Service Trusts submitted treatment data on 977 adults with intellectual disability, receiving antipsychotic medication for more than a year, for whom prescribing responsibility had been transferred to primary care. Therapeutic effects had been monitored in the past 6 months in 80% of cases with a documented communication indicating which service was responsible for this and 72% of those with no such communication. The respective proportions were 69% and 42% for side-effect monitoring, and 79% and 30% for considering reducing/stopping antipsychotic medication. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Where continuing antipsychotic medication is prescribed in primary care for people with intellectual disability, lack of guidance from secondary care regarding responsibilities for monitoring its effectiveness may be associated with inadequate review.

Indexed as

antipsychoticsIntellectual disabilitymental health teamsprimary carequality

Identifiers

PMID34308827
PMCPMC9813760
OpenAlexW3186906154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.