ReviewJournal of the American Heart Association2021
Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump as a Bridge to Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device.
Review in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Technological advances and clinical application of left ventricular assist devices in the treatment of advanced heart failure.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Review
- Article
- Application of VA-ECMO combined with IABP in a patient with cardiac arrest following fulminant myocarditis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Percutaneous extracorporeal ventricular assist device as a successful bridge strategy to durable left ventricular assist device in refractory cardiogenic shock: a case report.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock: A Narrative Review in Light of Recent Evidence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Degradation of the α-Carboxyl Terminus 11 Peptide:ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024Article
- Improvement of persistent anuria in severe myocardial infarction: the potential role of Impella 5.5 as a bridge to decision.BMJ case reports · 2023Article
- Bridging strategies and cardiac replacement outcomes in patients with acute decompensated heart failure-related cardiogenic shock.European journal of heart failure · 2023Article
- Case report: A novel surgical technique for rapid valve-in-ring implantation into the native aortic annulus during left ventricular assist device implantation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Left Ventricular Unloading in Acute on Chronic Heart Failure: From Statements to Clinical Practice.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are increasingly being used as destination therapy in patients with Stage D heart failure. It has been reported that a majority of patients who receive a durable LVAD (dLVAD) present in cardiogenic shock due to decompensated heart failure (ADHF-CS). As it stands, there is no consensus on the optimal management strategy for patients presenting with ADHF. Bridging with intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABPs) continues to be a therapeutic option in patients with hemodynamic instability due to cardiogenic shock. The majority of data regarding the use of IABP in cardiogenic shock come from studies in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock and demonstrates that there is no benefit of routine IABP use in this patient population. However, the role of IABPs as a bridge to dLVAD in ADHF-CS has yet to be determined. The hemodynamic changes seen in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock are known to be different and more acutely impaired than those presenting with ADHF-CS as evidenced by differences in pressure/volume loops. Thus, data should not be extrapolated across these 2 very different disease processes. The aim of this review is to describe results from contemporary studies examining the use of IABPs as a bridge to dLVAD in patients with ADHF-CS. Retrospective evidence from large registries suggests that the use of IABP as a bridge to dLVAD is feasible and safe when compared with other platforms of temporary mechanical circulatory support. However, there is currently a paucity of high-quality evidence examining this increasingly important clinical question.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.