Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34308554›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2021

Results of the Genetic Counselor SARS-CoV-2 Impact Survey from the National Society of Genetic Counselors: Progress and penalty during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Vivian Pan, Megan Doerr, Christin Hoell, Lauren Ryan, Deanna J Erwin, Gillian Hooker, Carrie Haverty, National Society of Genetic Counselors GC SARS-CoV-2 Impact Survey Working Group

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Vivian PanUniversity of Illinois Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Megan DoerrSage Bionetworks, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Christin HoellNorthwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Lauren RyanGRAIL, Inc, Menlo Park, California, USA.
Deanna J ErwinCity of Hope, Duarte, California, USA.
Gillian HookerConcert Genetics, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Carrie HavertyMiroculus, Inc, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1446-4220
National Society of Genetic Counselors GC SARS-CoV-2 Impact Survey Working Group
City of Hope · USConcert Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USMenlo School · USNorthwestern University · USSage Bionetworks · USSan Francisco Center for Psychoanalysis · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

NSGC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Genetic Counselor SARS-CoV-2 Impact Survey (GCSIS) describes the impact of the pandemic on genetic counselors and genetic counseling services. With this information, the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) can better: (1) support advocacy and access efforts for genetic counseling services at both federal- and state-level; (2) promote effective billing and reimbursement for genetic counseling services provided via telemedicine; and (3) make decisions about how to best support genetic counselors. The survey was hosted on a novel data collection and analysis platform from LunaDNA and was open to all genetic counselors (n = 5,531 based on professional society membership). Survey response rate was approximately 3.8% (n = 212/5,531), with a demographic distribution broadly representative of the North American genetic counseling field. Genetic counselors remained largely employed, providing genetic counseling services throughout the pandemic, although almost one in five respondents (17%, n = 35/211) reported experiencing some degree of pandemic-related financial hardship. Nearly all respondents (90%, n = 104/115) transitioned, at least in part, to remote work settings, with about half (47%. n = 88/189) reporting restrictions in the care they were able to provide. These shifts came at a cost: existing gaps in Medicare status for genetic counselors and attendant reimbursement concerns led to uncertainty about whether genetic counselors' work will be reimbursed. Outside of work, caregiving responsibilities increased for 34% (n = 74/212) of respondents. The results of the GCSIS amplify the importance of federal- and state-level advocacy efforts for genetic counselors and their employers. They also highlight the impact of broader cultural intransigence on our majority-female profession. During the pandemic, genetic counselors continued to provide care, but without consistent financial support or expectation of reimbursement. The ability to attract and retain talented professionals to the genetic counseling field will hinge on the success of continued advocacy efforts.

Indexed as

CounselorsCOVID-19Genetic CounselingSurveys and QuestionnairesFemaleHumansMaleMedicarePandemicsUnited StatesCOVIDCOVID-19genetic counselinggenetic counselorsSARS-CoV-2telemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34308554
PMCPMC8427012
OpenAlexW3184225515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.