ArticleThe East African health research journal2020
Two cases of Prune Belly Syndrome from Kagera Region Tanzania.
Article in The East African health research journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prune Belly Syndrome is a rare congenital disorder with unknown aetiology, consisting of a triad of abdominal muscle wall weakness, undescended testes, and urinary tract abnormalities. We are unaware of any preceding report of Prune Belly Syndrome in Tanzania, and here we describe two cases reported in Kagera region. The first case is a 2 month old boy with the triad of Prune Belly Syndrome along with pectus carinatum who died due to septicaemia. This case posed a diagnostic challenge at birth and during the natal period. Paucity of comprehensive knowledge of congenital malformations at the peripheral health facilities may have also contributed to the diagnostic challenge in the first place. The second case is a neonate who was referred to regional referral hospital where he was diagnosed with Prune Belly Syndrome at the age of four weeks. Because of limited capacity to manage congenital malformations at the regional referral hospital, he was referred to an urologist at the zonal referral hospital. However, inadequacies in supporting systems to the parents compounded care of the neonate with Prune Belly Syndrome. High index of Prune Belly Syndrome suspicion is needed in a resource limited setting in order to timely make diagnosis. There is also a need to strengthen institutional and individual's capacity for prenatal screening to detect congenital anomalies at an early stage of foetus development. Multidisciplinary management approach is necessary in order to improve the quality of life for patients with Prune Belly Syndrome. Psychosocial and medical support systems should be put in place in order to enhance preparedness for patient care in resource limited settings including equipping the referral hospital with different specialists and ensuring availability of basic investigations for patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.