ArticleThe East African health research journal2019
Evaluation of Prescriptions Dispensed in the Outpatient Pharmacies of a University Teaching Hospital in Moshi, Kilimanjaro Region, Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in The East African health research journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrescriptions written in daily medical practice are associated with increasing numbers of prescription writing errors. Both omission and commission errors are encountered and caused by prescribers of different cadres. Prescribing errors are associated with adverse drug events (ADEs), which are harmful to patients. This study aimed to determine the common prescription errors, the categories of prescribers who commit prescription errors, and the most prescribed drugs in the outpatient pharmacies in general practice at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (KCMC).
methodsA prospective cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted at KCMC, a referral and teaching university hospital. All prescription dispensed on 2 June 2017 from the hospital's 2 outpatient pharmacies were reviewed, and our analysis determined the different types of prescription errors. A form designed by the authors was used to collect data from the prescription forms.
resultsA total of 242 prescriptions were studied, and the most common omission errors were missing patients' weight (n=231, 95.5%), missing patients' address (n=213, 88.0%), missing drug dosage (n=159, 67.1%), and commission errors were due to wrong drug strength (n=10, 2.0%). Intern doctors were leading in writing prescriptions with errors (n=352, 25.6%), followed by residents (n=199, 14.5%), registrar doctors (n=167, 12.1%), and specialists (n=45, 3.3%). The most commonly prescribed drugs were antibiotics (n=120, 17.3%), antihypertensives (n=81, 11.7%), and analgesics (n=86, 12.4%).
conclusionThere were significant prescription errors at the study site, hence an intervention is needed to improve skills of prescribers. Educational interventions can substantially contribute to minimising such errors. Initaiting programmes and short courses on prescription writing before medical internship at the health facility might also be helpful.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.