Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34308170›Full record

ArticleThe East African health research journal2018

Potential Value of Qiagen and PrepIT•MAX Kits in Extraction of Mycobacterial DNA From Presumptive Tuberculosis Archived Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissues.

Yunus Ayub, Jackson T Mollel, Erasto V Mbugi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The East African health research journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 79% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Drug Resistance and Molecular Characteristics ofJournal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yunus AyubBiochemistry Department, School of Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Jackson T MollelDepartment of Biological and Pre-Clinical studies, Institute of Traditional Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Erasto V MbugiBiochemistry Department, School of Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZMinistry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children · TZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA analysis has potential for screening for and diagnosing a variety of conditions as well as the characterization of various pathogens for many purposes including to identify genetic disorders and mutations, study genetic diversity, and establish evolutional trends.

methodsOur study compared the performance of 2 DNA extraction kits: Qiagen and prepIT•MAX. The study tested 160 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) human tissue samples that had been collected at Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH) between 2010 and 2016. For each sample, DNA extraction was performed using both the Qiagen and prepIT•MAX kits followed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests to target the RNA polymerase gene and gel electrophoresis.

resultsThe findings showed that the Qiagen was 3 times superior to the prepIT•MAX kit in successfully extracting mycobacterial DNA from presumptive tuberculosis (TB) FFPE tissues. Of the 160 previously Ziehl-Neelsen stain-negative

conclusionsA combination of molecular techniques, microscopy, and pathological features increases detection of

Identifiers

PMID34308170
PMCPMC8279293
OpenAlexW2958640719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.