Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34308096›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2021

Rivaroxaban thromboprophylaxis for gastric/gastroesophageal junction tumors versus other tumors: A post hoc analysis of the randomized CASSINI trial.

Jodi V Mones, Michael B Streiff, Alok A Khorana, Gemma A Bendheim, C V Damaraju, Peter Wildgoose, Paul Burton, Hanno Riess, Gerald A Soff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Implementation failure: thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients with cancer.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jodi V MonesHematology Service Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA.
Michael B StreiffDivision of Hematology Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA.
Alok A KhoranaTaussig Cancer Institute and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA.
Gemma A BendheimHematology Service Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA.
C V DamarajuJanssen Scientific Affairs, LLC Titusville NJ USA.
Peter WildgooseJanssen Scientific Affairs, LLC Titusville NJ USA.
Paul BurtonJanssen Scientific Affairs, LLC Titusville NJ USA.
Hanno RiessCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany.
Gerald A SoffHematology Service Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8781-903X
Janssen (United States) · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DECleveland Clinic · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Novel approaches to improve prediction of cancer-associated thrombosisU01HL143402 · NHLBI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI KHORANA, ALOK A, MCCRAE, KEITH R. · 2018 to 2022
$4.7M
Risk-adapted thromboprophylaxis of hospitalized cancer patientsR34HL127156 · NHLBI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI KHORANA, ALOK A, ZWICKER, JEFFREY · 2016 to 2018
$810k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NHLBI NIH HHS R34 HL127156NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL143402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProphylactic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban significantly reduced the risk of cancer-associated thrombosis during the intervention period in the CASSINI trial. Direct oral anticoagulants may increase the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) tract bleeding in patients with an in situ GI tract cancer or lesion.

objectiveThis post hoc analysis characterized the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with and without gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) tumors.

methodsPrimary and secondary efficacy end points and adjudicated bleeding events, including bleeding sites, were analyzed for the intent-to-treat population by cancer type (G/GEJ vs non-G/GEJ) for the 180-day observation period.

resultsIn patients with G/GEJ tumors, the rates for the primary efficacy end point were 3.4% for rivaroxaban versus 6.9% for placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-1.80). In patients with non-G/GEJ tumors, the rivaroxaban group had a lower risk of the primary end point (6.6% vs 9.3%; HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.40-1.21). Rates of major bleeding in patients with G/GEJ tumors were 4.6% (4/88) versus 1.2% (1/85) for rivaroxaban and placebo; rates in patients with non-G/GEJ tumors were 1.3% (4/317) versus 0.9% (3/319), respectively.

conclusionsExcluding patients with G/GEJ tumors resulted in a definable population of cancer patients who achieved an improved benefit-risk balance from rivaroxaban prophylaxis.

Indexed as

anticoagulantscancergastricgastroesophageal junctionprophylaxisrivaroxabanthrombosisvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID34308096
PMCPMC8292144
OpenAlexW3184681426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.