ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2021
Empirical evaluation of methods for
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome misassembly detection using Stash: A data structure based on stochastic tile hashing.PloS one · 2026Article
- Benchmarking genome assemblers for four bacterial models based on contiguity, correctness, and completeness.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative study of tools for copy number variation detection using next-generation sequencing data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- GoldPolish-target: targeted long-read genome assembly polishing.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- MHConstructor: a high-throughput, haplotype-informed solution to the MHC assembly challenge.Genome biology · 2024Article
- AssemblyQC: a Nextflow pipeline for reproducible reporting of assembly quality.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Virulence Potential and Antimicrobial Resistance ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Article
- Mabs, a suite of tools for gene-informed genome assembly.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Y chromosome sequence and epigenomic reconstruction across human populations.Communications biology · 2023Article
- SCRAPT: an iterative algorithm for clustering large 16S rRNA gene data sets.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Comparison ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Improvements to the Gulf pipefishGigaByte (Hong Kong, China) · 2023Article
- Article
- Comparative Genomics Provides Insights Into Genetic Diversity ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Functional characterization of prokaryotic dark matter: the road so far and what lies ahead.Current research in microbial sciences · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Technologies for next-generation sequencing (NGS) have stimulated an exponential rise in high-throughput sequencing projects and resulted in the development of new read-assembly algorithms. A drastic reduction in the costs of generating short reads on the genomes of new organisms is attributable to recent advances in NGS technologies such as Ion Torrent, Illumina, and PacBio. Genome research has led to the creation of high-quality reference genomes for several organisms, and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.