Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34307664›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2021

Difference in Performance of EPI Pigs Fed Either Lipase-Predigested or Creon®-Supplemented Semielemental Diet.

Stefan G Pierzynowski, Anna Socha-Banasiak, Monika Sobol, Grzegorz Skiba, Stanisława Raj, Olena Dovban, Galyna Ushakova, Jarosław Woliński, Nadiia Mosiichuk, Paulina Szczurek-Janicka and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 59% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Stefan G PierzynowskiDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund 22362, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0308-3214
Anna Socha-BanasiakDepartment of Gastroenterology, Allergology and Pediatrics, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute, Łódź 93-338, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3690-6328
Monika SobolLaboratory of Large Animal Models, Kielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jabłonna 05-110, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1421-4259
Grzegorz SkibaDepartment of Animal Nutrition, Kielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jabłonna 05-110, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4475-2258
Stanisława RajDepartment of Animal Nutrition, Kielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jabłonna 05-110, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6133-2170
Olena DovbanDepartment of Biochemistry and Physiology, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Dnipro 49050, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7851-3629
Galyna UshakovaDepartment of Biochemistry and Physiology, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Dnipro 49050, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5633-2739
Jarosław WolińskiLaboratory of Large Animal Models, Kielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jabłonna 05-110, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8645-1045
Nadiia MosiichukDepartment of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Ivano-Frankivsk 78018, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5362-1164
Paulina Szczurek-JanickaDepartment of Nutrition Physiology, National Research Institute of Animal Production, Balice 32-083, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9008-3505
Marek PieszkaDepartment of Nutrition Physiology, National Research Institute of Animal Production, Balice 32-083, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4342-2719
Marian KamyczekNational Research Institute of Animal Production, Experimental Station Pawłowice, Pawłowice 64-122, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6534-0626
Ewa ŚwięchDepartment of Animal Nutrition, Kielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jabłonna 05-110, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8752-1161
Halyna ShmigelDepartment of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Ivano-Frankivsk 78018, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6309-330X
Marcin SontaDepartment of Animal Breeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6893-012X
Elżbieta CzkwianiancDepartment of Gastroenterology, Allergology and Pediatrics, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute, Łódź 93-338, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0384-2049
Kateryna PierzynowskaDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund 22362, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3290-339X
Kielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition · PLNational Research Institute of Animal Production · PLLund University · SEOles Honchar Dnipro National University · UAPolish Mother’s Memorial Hospital Research Institute · PLVasyl Stefanyk Carpathian National University · UAWarsaw University of Life Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) and fat predigestion are key in ensuring the optimal growth of patients with cystic fibrosis. Our study attempted to highlight differences between fat predigestion and conventional PERT on body composition of young pigs with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI). EPI and healthy pigs were fed with high-fat diet for six weeks. During the last two weeks of the study, all pigs received additional nocturnal alimentation with Peptamen AF (PAF) and were divided into three groups: H-healthy pigs receiving PAF; P-EPI pigs receiving PAF+PERT; and L-EPI pigs receiving PAF predigested with an immobilized microbial lipase. Additional nocturnal alimentation increased the body weight gain of EPI pigs with better efficacy in P pigs. Humerus length and area in pigs in groups L and P were lower than that observed in pigs in group H (

Indexed as

DietEnzyme Replacement TherapyFeeding BehaviorAnimalsAstrocytesBody CompositionBone and BonesExocrine Pancreatic InsufficiencyGastrointestinal TractLipaseNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuronsPancrelipaseSwineWeight GainLipaseNerve Tissue ProteinsPancrelipase

Identifiers

PMID34307664
PMCPMC8282365
OpenAlexW3178192329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.