Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34307639›Full record

ArticleInterspeech2018

Using Prosodic and Lexical Information for Learning Utterance-level Behaviors in Psychotherapy.

Karan Singla, Zhuohao Chen, Nikolaos Flemotomos, James Gibson, Dogan Can, David C Atkins, Shrikanth Narayanan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interspeech, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Multimodal Automatic Coding of Client Behavior in Motivational Interviewing.Proceedings of the ... ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. ICMI (Conference) · 2020
    Article
  8. Towards End-2-end Learning for Predicting Behavior Codes from Spoken Utterances in Psychotherapy Conversations.Proceedings of the conference. Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · 2020
    Article
  9. IMPROVING THE PREDICTION OF THERAPIST BEHAVIORS IN ADDICTION COUNSELING BY EXPLOITING CLASS CONFUSIONS.Proceedings of the ... IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. ICASSP (Conference) · 2019
    Article
  10. Multi-label Multi-task Deep Learning for Behavioral Coding.IEEE transactions on affective computing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karan SinglaSignal Analysis and Interpretation Lab, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Zhuohao ChenSignal Analysis and Interpretation Lab, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Nikolaos FlemotomosSignal Analysis and Interpretation Lab, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
James GibsonSignal Analysis and Interpretation Lab, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Dogan CanSignal Analysis and Interpretation Lab, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
David C AtkinsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Shrikanth NarayananSignal Analysis and Interpretation Lab, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

Implementation of Technology-Based Evaluation of Motivational InterviewingR01AA018673 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ATKINS, DAVID CHARLES, NARAYANAN, SHRIKANTH · 2010 to 2020
$5.9M
Using Technology to Scale Up the Evaluation of Motivational InterviewingK02AA023814 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ATKINS, DAVID CHARLES · 2015 to 2019
$690k
NIAAA NIH HHS K02 AA023814NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA018673
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we present an approach for predicting utterance level behaviors in psychotherapy sessions using both speech and lexical features. We train long short term memory (LSTM) networks with an attention mechanism using words, both manually and automatically transcribed, and prosodic features, at the word level, to predict the annotated behaviors. We demonstrate that prosodic features provide discriminative information relevant to the behavior task and show that they improve prediction when fused with automatically derived lexical features. Additionally, we investigate the weights of the attention mechanism to determine words and prosodic patterns which are of importance to the behavior prediction task.

Indexed as

behavioral signal processingmutlimodal learningprosody

Identifiers

PMID34307639
PMCPMC8297805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.