Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34307346›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2021

A Composite Lactide-Mineral 3D-Printed Scaffold for Bone Repair and Regeneration.

Rayan Fairag, Li Li, Jose Luis Ramirez-GarciaLuna, M Scott Taylor, Brian Gaerke, Michael H Weber, Derek H Rosenzweig, Lisbet Haglund

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Rayan FairagDepartment of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Li LiDepartment of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jose Luis Ramirez-GarciaLunaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
M Scott TaylorPoly-Med Inc., Anderson, SC, United States.
Brian GaerkePoly-Med Inc., Anderson, SC, United States.
Michael H WeberDepartment of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Derek H RosenzweigDepartment of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Lisbet HaglundDepartment of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
McGill University · CAMontreal General Hospital · CAPoly Med (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orthopedic tumor resection, trauma, or degenerative disease surgeries can result in large bone defects and often require bone grafting. However, standard autologous bone grafting has been associated with donor site morbidity and/or limited quantity. As an alternate, allografts with or without metallic or polyether-etherketone have been used as grafting substitutes. However, these may have drawbacks as well, including stress shielding, pseudarthrosis, disease-transmission, and infection. There is therefore a need for alternative bone substitutes, such as the use of mechanically compliant three-dimensional (3D)-printed scaffolds. Several off-the-shelf materials are available for low-cost fused deposition 3D printing such as polylactic acid (PLA) and polycaprolactone (PCL). We have previously described the feasibility of 3D-printed PLA scaffolds to support cell activity and extracellular matrix deposition. In this study, we investigate two medical-grade filaments consistent with specifications found in American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard for semi-crystalline polylactide polymers for surgical implants, a pure polymer (100M) and a copolymeric material (7415) for their cytocompatibility and suitability in bone tissue engineering. Moreover, we assessed the impact on osteo-inductive properties with the addition of beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) minerals and assessed their mechanical properties. 100M and 7415 scaffolds with the additive β-TCP demonstrated superior mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) differentiation detected

Indexed as

3D printingbone repairbone substitutecompositescaffoldβ-TCP

Identifiers

PMID34307346
PMCPMC8299729
OpenAlexW3179476493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.