ArticleWorld journal of plastic surgery2021
Evaluation of Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) as a Scaffold for Adipose-Derived Stem Cell Transfer in the Rat Model.
Article in World journal of plastic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioengineered skin constructs based on mesenchymal stromal cells and acellular dermal matrix exposed to inflammatory microenvironment releasing growth factors involved in skin repair.Stem cell research & therapy · 2023Article
- A Preliminary Study of Constructing the Tissue-Engineered Corpus Cavernosum With Autologous Adipose Stem Cells In Vivo.Sexual medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study was designed for the evaluation of Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) as a scaffold for adipose-derived stem cell transferring in the rat model.
methodsThis experimental study was done in the Burn Research Center of Iran University of Medical Sciences and Bonyakhteh Research Center, Tehran, Iran according to the standards of laboratory animals. Overall, 26 healthy Sprague-Dawley rats were used. Two of them were used to prepare ADM. In group one, the first wound on each, rat was spread with the mixture of fibrin gel and autologous stem cell. Only the stem cells combined with fibrinogen were spread on the other wound. In group two, the first wound on each rat was covered only with ADM, and the second wound was covered with gauze Vaseline. To perform sampling we used observation and photography at 7-30 days. Overall, 48 samples were taken of all the rats using skin punch biopsy on the 30th day for histopathology evaluation.
resultsThere were significant differences in each group; however, the difference between different groups on days was not significant. In pathology, epithelialization, vascularization, the amount of collagen, collagen arrangement, the number of fibroblasts, and inflammation indices were investigated. The total score in each group was used for analysis. In statistical analysis, there was no pathology score difference among groups.
conclusion
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.