ArticleOpen veterinary journal
Experimental infection of
Article in Open veterinary journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dissemination of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium between humans and fishes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Thyme-synthesized silver nanoparticles mitigate immunosuppression, oxidative damage, and histopathological alterations induced by multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecalis in Oreochromis niloticus: in vitro and in vivo assays.Fish physiology and biochemistry · 2025Article
- Enrofloxacin, Effective Treatment ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- ChickenVeterinary world · 2023Article
- Suppression of Streptococcosis and Modulation of the Gut Bacteriome in Nile Tilapia (Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Chicken embryo lethality assay for determining the lethal dose, tissue distribution and pathogenicity of clinical Enterococcus cecorum isolates from poultry.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Streptococcosis, as a bacterial disease with broad tropism in fish and one of the causes of septicemia. Aim: This study was undertaken to complete the reporting gap on the pathogenicity profile and clinical symptoms of Methods: The method used in this artificial infection study using red tilapia, which were divided into two types of route groups infection, namely intraperitoneal (IP) and peroral (PO) with bacterial concentrations given for each route of infection to be 2.1 × 10 Results: The results showed variations in clinical symptoms inflicted on fish through death or the moribund stage. The highest mortality occurred in the treatment group of 2.1 × 10 Conclusion:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.