Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34307068›Full record

ReviewAnnals of global health2021

Training Global Health Leaders: A Critical Review of Competency Gaps.

Bhakti Hansoti, Elizabeth Hahn, Caroline Dolive, Anike Akridge, Melanie Atwell, Anant Mishra, Meike Schleiff

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bhakti HansotiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0188-9764
Elizabeth HahnJohns Hopkins Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2929-5335
Caroline DoliveSustaining Technical and Analytical Resources (STAR) project, Public Health Institute, USA.
Anike AkridgeSustaining Technical and Analytical Resources (STAR) project, Public Health Institute, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1879-2339
Melanie AtwellSustaining Technical and Analytical Resources (STAR) project, Public Health Institute, USA.
Anant MishraDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3464-4088
Meike SchleiffDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6492-3718

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Global health leadership training seeks to strengthen the existing global health workforce to build leaders that have the necessary knowledge, attitudes, and skills to deliver a vision for public health and healthcare delivery. In order to develop impactful training curricula, there is a greater need to understand the areas of focus required to strengthen the global health workforce. Objectives: This paper seeks to present a critical analysis of the competency gaps among participants of a single global health training program. Methods: This is a cross-sectional observational study conducted during the implementation of the Sustaining Technical and Analytical Resources (STAR) project from May 1, 2018 to May 31, 2020. We utilized descriptive statistics to analyze the baseline competency assessment of STAR participants using a customized framework that was developed for the program. Findings: Among the 74 individuals enrolled in the study, we identified that there were significant differences in milestone achievement across participant types for all eight competencies (p < 0.001). Overall, US-based fellows reported higher perceived competency levels than low- and middle-income (LMIC)-based fellows in all categories except Capacity Strengthening (4, 23.5% leading vs. 12, 63.5% leading). LMIC fellows reported lower achieved milestones in Gender Equity (only 6, 31.5% at practicing) and Development Practice (only 6, 31.5% at practicing). Conclusions: Our study identified critical needs in the domains of public health ethics, health equity, and social justice and gender equity. Further emphasis on these domains in global health curricula and other professional development is critical to strengthen the knowledge and skills of individuals who are well-placed to advance the development of an equitable global health workforce.

Indexed as

Competency-Based EducationGlobal HealthLeadershipPublic HealthCapacity BuildingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleObservational Studies as TopicWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID34307068
PMCPMC8284503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.