Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34307067›Full record

ArticleAnnals of global health2021

Training Curriculum, Skills, and Competencies for Global Health Leaders: Good Practices and Lessons Learned.

Meike J Schleiff, Patrick Mwirigi Mburugu, John Cape, Rama Mwenesi, Nathanael Sirili, Sean Tackett, David P Urassa, Bhakti Hansoti, Yohana Mashalla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Meike J SchleiffJohns Hopkins School of Public Health.ORCID 0000-0001-6492-3718
Patrick Mwirigi MburuguJomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, School Of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0001-7635-5236
John CapeGlobal Health Corps.ORCID 0000-0002-1504-6955
Rama MwenesiUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing.ORCID 0000-0001-9969-453X
Nathanael SiriliSchool of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0001-5205-624X
Sean TackettJohns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center.ORCID 0000-0001-5369-7225
David P UrassaSchool of Public Health, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-0970-0826
Bhakti HansotiJohns Hopkins School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0003-0188-9764
Yohana MashallaSchool of Health Sciences, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.ORCID 0000-0003-2031-3672

Funding

PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This paper aims to depict unique perspectives and to compare and contrast three leadership programs for global health in order to enable other training institutions to design impactful curricula. Methods: We purposively selected three global health training programs. We used a six-step curriculum development framework to systematically compare the curriculum process across programs and to identify best practices and factors contributing to the impact of each of these programs. Findings: All three fellowship programs undertook an intentional and in-depth approach to curriculum development. Each identified competencies related to leadership and technical skills. Each defined goals, though the goals differed to align with the desired impact of the program, ranging from improving the impact of HIV programming, supporting stronger global health program implementation, and supporting the next generation of global health leaders. All programs implemented the curriculum through an onboarding phase, a delivery of core content in different formats, and a wrap-up or endline phase. During implementation, each program also utilized networking and mentoring to enhance connections and to support application of learning in work roles. Programs faced overlapping challenges and opportunities including funding, strengthening partnerships, and finding ways to engage and support alumni. Conclusions: Local ownership of programs is critical, including tailoring curricula to the needs of specific contexts. Strong partnerships and resources are needed to ensure program sustainability and impact. Key Takeaways: Global health competencies and curricula should be linked to local health system needs and contexts where learners are working.Emphasizing both individualistic and collectivist approaches to learning is important in engaging and supporting diverse global health learners.Emphasizing mentorship and opportunities to apply learning in contexts where learners are working is important in order to provide support to learners as they work to integrate what they are learning into their professional roles and activities.Partnerships and resources-including donor support-are essential to implement and sustain robust leadership curricula and to provide opportunities for experiential and didactic learning.

Indexed as

CurriculumLeadershipGlobal HealthHumansMentoringProgram Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID34307067
PMCPMC8284497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.