Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34307064›Full record

ArticleAnnals of global health2021

Experiential Learning and Mentorship in Global Health Leadership Programs: Capturing Lessons from Across the Globe.

Daniela C Rodríguez, Nasreen S Jessani, Joseph Zunt, Sara Ardila-Gómez, Patience A Muwanguzi, Sylvester Ndeso Atanga, Bruno Sunguya, Carey Farquhar, Esther Nasuuna

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Lessons Learned from the Lessons Learned in Public Health during the First Years of COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Daniela C RodríguezJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2523-1123
Nasreen S JessaniCentre for Evidence Based Health Care, Stellenbosch University, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1160-3099
Joseph ZuntUniversity of Washington, Seattle, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5524-354X
Sara Ardila-GómezUniversity of Washington, Seattle, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0022-7438
Patience A MuwanguziSchool of Health Sciences, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-0403-9327
Sylvester Ndeso AtangaSaint Monica American International University.ORCID 0000-0001-8321-6875
Bruno SunguyaMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0003-3625-0725
Carey FarquharDepartments of Global Health, Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Washington.ORCID 0000-0001-8575-3439
Esther NasuunaInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-2923-6482
Authorised Association Consortium · TZJohns Hopkins University · USMakerere University · UGSeattle University · USStellenbosch University · ZAUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

NPGH LEADERs YR12: OBSSR (Greenberg, Ngwafong Mukere) & NIBIB (Lee)D43TW009345 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Dibyadyuti Datta, Chandy C. John · 2017 to 2026
$15.2M
NURTURE:Research Training and Mentoring Program for Career Development of Faculty at Makerere University College of Health SciencesD43TW010132 · FIC · MAKERERE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SEWANKAMBO, NELSON K · 2015 to 2019
$4.3M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009345FIC NIH HHS D43 TW010132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The changing global landscape of disease and public health crises, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic, call for a new generation of global health leaders. As global health leadership programs evolve, many have incorporated experiential learning and mentoring (ELM) components into their structure. However, there has been incomplete consideration on how ELM activities are deployed, what challenges they face and how programs adapt to meet those challenges. This paper builds on the co-authors' experiences as trainees, trainers, organizers and evaluators of six global health leadership programs to reflect on lessons learned regarding ELM. We also consider ethics, technology, gender, age and framing that influence how ELM activities are developed and implemented. Findings: Despite the diverse origins and funding of these programs, all six are focused on training participants from low- and middle-income countries drawing on a diversity of professions. Each program uses mixed didactic approaches, practice-based placements, competency and skills-driven curricula, and mentorship via various modalities. Main metrics for success include development of trainee networks, acquisition of skills and formation of relationships; programs that included research training had specific research metrics as well. Common challenges the programs face include ensuring clarity of expectations of all participants and mentors; maintaining connection among trainees; meeting the needs of trainee cohorts with different skill sets and starting points; and ensuring trainee cohorts capture age, gender and other forms of diversity. Conclusions: ELM activities for global health leadership are proving even more critical now as the importance of effective individual leaders in responding to crises becomes evident. Future efforts for ELM in global health leadership should emphasize local adaptation and sustainability. Practice-based learning and established mentoring relationships provide the building blocks for competent leaders to navigate complex dynamics with the flexibility and conscientiousness needed to improve the health of global populations. Key Takeaways: Experiential learning and mentorship activities within global health leadership programs provide the hands-on practice and support that the next generation of global health leaders need to address the health challenges of our times.Six global health leadership programs with experiential learning and mentorship components are showcased to highlight differences and similarities in their approaches and capture a broad picture of achievements that can help inform future programs.Emphasis on inter-professional training, mixed-learning approaches and mentorship modalities were common across programs. Both individual capacity building and development of trainees' professional networks were seen as critical, reflecting the value of inter-personal connections for long-term leadership success.During program design, future programs should recognize the "frame" within which the program will be incorporated and intentionally address diversity-in all its forms-during recruitment as well as consider North-South ethics, leadership roles, hierarchies and transition plans.

Indexed as

LeadershipClinical CompetenceDeveloping CountriesEducation, Medical, GraduateGlobal HealthHumansInternational CooperationMentoringProblem-Based LearningProgram Development

Identifiers

PMID34307064
PMCPMC8284496
OpenAlexW3179825662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.