ArticleAdditive manufacturing2021
Effects of surface area and topography on 3D printed tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone grafting applications.
Article in Additive manufacturing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current Advancements in Bone Grafting Substitutes for Osteoporotic Distal Tibia Fractures: A Narrative Review of Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate (Neobone™) and Demineralized Bone Matrix.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Ginger extract release from 3D printed calcium phosphate scaffolds for bone regeneration.Biomaterials advances · 2026Article
- Vascularization and Bone Regeneration with 3D-Printed Composite Scaffolds in Rodent Critical-Size Calvarial Defects: Systematic Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- A review of 3D printed medical implant design.3D printing in medicine · 2026Article
- Nanotopographical Features of Polymeric Nanocomposite Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: A Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Mechanical and biological properties of 3D printed bone tissue engineering scaffolds.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- 3D printed scaffolds with quercetin and vitamin D3 nanocarriers: In vitro cellular evaluation.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2024Article
- Blueprints of Architected Materials: A Guide to Metamaterial Design for Tissue Engineering.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2024Review
- Personalized bioceramic grafts for craniomaxillofacial bone regeneration.International journal of oral science · 2024Review
- Efficient Hydroxyapatite Extraction from Salmon Bone Waste: An Improved Lab-Scaled Physico-Chemico-Biological Process.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Electrowriting patterns and electric field harness directional cell migration for skin wound healing.Materials today. Bio · 2024Article
- Influence of physicochemical characteristics of calcium phosphate-based biomaterials in cranio-maxillofacial bone regeneration. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of preclinical models.Materials today. Bio · 2024Article
- Evaluation of bioactivity and antibacterial properties of Ti6Al4V-based green biocomposite implant encompassing TiOHeliyon · 2024Article
- Vitamin D3 Release from MgO Doped 3D Printed TCP Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2024Article
- 3D Printed SiOJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2024Article
- Optimizing collagen-based biomaterials for periodontal regeneration: clinical opportunities and challenges.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- The 3-dimensional printing for dental tissue regeneration: the state of the art and future challenges.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Multifunctional polydopamine - ZnBiomaterials advances · 2023Article
- Deep eutectic solvent-assisted fabrication of bioinspired 3D carbon-calcium phosphate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.RSC advances · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM), or 3D printing, of bioceramic scaffolds promises personalized treatment options for patients with site-specific designability for repair and reconstruction of bone defects. Although the theory for creating these complex geometries has already been made possible through AM's advancement, such shapes' manufacturability is difficult due to printing with ceramics' inherent complexities. Ceramics have the added challenge of being highly brittle, poor handleability of green (pre-sintered) parts, making complex shape high strength parts challenging to manufacture. This has led to a significant literature gap regarding the feasibility of creating bioceramic scaffolds with unique architectures that can be used in site-specific, individualized patient treatment. This work aims to successfully create complex topographical surfaces of cylindrical bone-like scaffolds to understand the correlation of increasing the scaffold surface area on mechanical properties and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.