Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34307005›Full record

ArticleResults in physics2021

On the accuracy of ARIMA based prediction of COVID-19 spread.

Haneen Alabdulrazzaq, Mohammed N Alenezi, Yasmeen Rawajfih, Bareeq A Alghannam, Abeer A Al-Hassan, Fawaz S Al-Anzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Results in physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Anxiety disorders in China and G20 countries: A comparative burden study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haneen AlabdulrazzaqComputer Science & Information Systems Department, Public Authority for Applied Education & Training, Kuwait.
Mohammed N AleneziComputer Science & Information Systems Department, Public Authority for Applied Education & Training, Kuwait.
Yasmeen RawajfihComputer Science Department, Tuskegee University, AL, USA.
Bareeq A AlghannamComputer Science & Information Systems Department, Public Authority for Applied Education & Training, Kuwait.
Abeer A Al-HassanInformation Systems and Operations Management Department, Kuwait University, Kuwait.
Fawaz S Al-AnziComputer Engineering Department, Kuwait University, Kuwait.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 was declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization in March 2020, and has infected more than 4 million people worldwide with over 300,000 deaths by early May 2020. Many researchers around the world incorporated various prediction techniques such as Susceptible-Infected-Recovered model, Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Recovered model, and Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average model (ARIMA) to forecast the spread of this pandemic. The ARIMA technique was not heavily used in forecasting COVID-19 by researchers due to the claim that it is not suitable for use in complex and dynamic contexts. The aim of this study is to test how accurate the ARIMA best-fit model predictions were with the actual values reported after the entire time of the prediction had elapsed. We investigate and validate the accuracy of an ARIMA model over a relatively long period of time using Kuwait as a case study. We started by optimizing the parameters of our model to find a best-fit through examining auto-correlation function and partial auto correlation function charts, as well as different accuracy measures. We then used the best-fit model to forecast confirmed and recovered cases of COVID-19 throughout the different phases of Kuwait's gradual preventive plan. The results show that despite the dynamic nature of the disease and constant revisions made by the Kuwaiti government, the actual values for most of the time period observed were well within bounds of our selected ARIMA model prediction at 95% confidence interval. Pearson's correlation coefficient for the forecast points with the actual recorded data was found to be 0.996. This indicates that the two sets are highly correlated. The accuracy of the prediction provided by our ARIMA model is both appropriate and satisfactory.

Indexed as

ARIMA modelCOVID-19Forecasting modelKuwaitMathematical modelingPandemicPrediction performanceSARS-CoV2Statistical modeling

Identifiers

PMID34307005
PMCPMC8279942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.