Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34306970›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health2022

Postpartum care indications and methodological quality:a systematic review of guidelines.

Ming Yang, Wei Yue, Xinrui Han, Chunhong Hu, Xiaoning Sun, Jianghe Luo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Inhibitors and facilitators to the utilization of postpartum care in China: an integrative review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ming Yang *School of Nursing, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 232, Waihuan East Road, Guangzhou University City, Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong China.ORCID 0000-0001-9860-2947
Wei Yue *School of Nursing, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 232, Waihuan East Road, Guangzhou University City, Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong China.
Xinrui HanSchool of Nursing, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 232, Waihuan East Road, Guangzhou University City, Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong China.
Chunhong HuDepartment of Spleen and Stomach, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong China.
Xiaoning SunSchool of Nursing, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 232, Waihuan East Road, Guangzhou University City, Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong China.
Jianghe LuoSchool of Nursing, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 232, Waihuan East Road, Guangzhou University City, Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The coverage of postpartum care is not ideal, and has not been used very well due to not enough attention being paid to the puerperal women and newborns, especially in developing countries. Practice guidelines on postpartum care provide beneficial practice guidance and help to reduce maternal mortality. However, little is known about the credibility and consistency of those guidelines. This systematic review was conducted to summarize main postpartum care indications and appraise methodological quality of guidelines. Methods: Seven literature databases and guideline development institutions and organizations of obstetrics and maternity care were searched. Two reviewers independently assessed guideline quality using the AGREE II instrument, and synthesized consistent and non-consistent recommendations using the content analysis approach. Results: Twenty-nine guidelines were included and a total of eight postpartum care indications were identified. Most guidelines focused on care indications and interventions including exclusive breastfeeding, maternal nutrition, home visit, infant or newborn care and sexuality, contraception, and birth spacing. However, indications such as pain or weight management, pelvic floor muscle training, abdominal rehabilitation, and mental health got less attention. Additionally, the overall quality of all involving postpartum care guidelines is relatively good and acceptable. Conclusions: Guidelines developed by NICE, RANO, and WHO indicated higher methodological quality. For postpartum care indications, most guidelines are incomplete. Variation in practice guidelines for postpartum care recommendations exists. In the future, implementation research into shared decision-making, as well as further high-quality research to broaden the evidence base for postpartum care indications is recommended. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-021-01629-4.

Indexed as

Methodological qualityPostpartum carePractice guidelinesSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34306970
PMCPMC8288832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.