Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34306588›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2021

Deep Learning-Based Magnetic Resonance Imaging Image Features for Diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

Zijian Li, Shiyou Ren, Ri Zhou, Xiaocheng Jiang, Tian You, Canfeng Li, Wentao Zhang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Detection Method of Athlete Joint Injury Based on Deep Learning Model.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zijian LiDepartment of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1674-4234
Shiyou RenDepartment of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6498-0090
Ri ZhouDepartment of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3697-6008
Xiaocheng JiangDepartment of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1243-2831
Tian YouDepartment of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4499-126X
Canfeng LiDepartment of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3388-0919
Wentao ZhangDepartment of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9178-6501
Peking University Shenzhen Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To study and explore the adoption value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, a multimodal feature fusion model based on deep learning was proposed for MRI diagnosis. After the related performance of the proposed algorithm was evaluated, it was utilized in the diagnosis of knee joint injuries. Thirty patients with knee joint injuries who came to our hospital for treatment were selected, and all patients were diagnosed with MRI based on deep learning multimodal feature fusion model (MRI group) and arthroscopy (arthroscopy group). The results showed that deep learning-based MRI sagittal plane detection had a great advantage and a high accuracy of 96.28% in the prediction task of ACL tearing. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MRI in the diagnosis of ACL injury was 96.78%, 90.62%, and 92.17%, respectively, and there was no considerable difference in contrast to the results obtained through arthroscopy (

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesDeep LearningKnee InjuriesArthroscopyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID34306588
PMCPMC8272672
OpenAlexW3177989452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.