Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34306537›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2021

Photobiomodulation and myofascial temporomandibular disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis followed by cost-effectiveness analysis.

Ana-Paula-Taboada Sobral, Sergio-de Sousa Sobral, Thalita-Molinos Campos, Anna-Carolina-Ratto-Tempestini Horliana, Kristianne-Porta-Santos Fernandes, Sandra-Kalil Bussadori, Lara-Jansiski Motta

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana-Paula-Taboada SobralPostgraduate Program in Biophotonics Applied to Health Sciences, UNINOVE - São Paulo, Brazil.
Sergio-de Sousa SobralPostgraduate Program in Biophotonics Applied to Health Sciences, UNINOVE - São Paulo, Brazil.
Thalita-Molinos CamposPostgraduate Program in Biophotonics Applied to Health Sciences, UNINOVE - São Paulo, Brazil.
Anna-Carolina-Ratto-Tempestini HorlianaPostgraduate Program in Biophotonics Applied to Health Sciences, UNINOVE - São Paulo, Brazil.
Kristianne-Porta-Santos FernandesPostgraduate Program in Biophotonics Applied to Health Sciences, UNINOVE - São Paulo, Brazil.
Sandra-Kalil BussadoriPostgraduate Program in Biophotonics Applied to Health Sciences, UNINOVE - São Paulo, Brazil.
Lara-Jansiski MottaPostgraduate Program in Biophotonics Applied to Health Sciences, UNINOVE - São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Nove de Julho · BRInstitute for Postgraduate Medical Education · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhotobiomodulation (PBM) is a non-invasive and non-pharmacological treatment, which, has shown beneficial results in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) related pain. This systematic review and meta-analysis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of photobiomodulation in the treatment of myofascial pain associated with (TMD by analyzing randomized clinical trials published from 2007 to February 2019. The secondary objective of the study was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of TMD treatment with photobiomodulation in patients with myofascial pain. MATERIAL AND

methodsInternational databases were used: Pubmed, Medline and Web of Science; the initial search raised 316 papers, and only 17 papers met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review (SR). Of these, only 04 papers met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis: VAS data represented by numerical scores and placebo control group.

resultsAs for the wavelength, the most used value was 780nm (followed by 830nm. The most used treatment time was 4 offered treatments for 4 weeks; followed by 10 sessions. Regarding periodicity, 9 studies used 2 times a week. The meta-analysis showed that laser-treated groups had painful symptoms improvement that was superior to the control group (mean difference 1.49;95% CI = -1.67; -1.32). Laser therapy showed a cost-effectiveness of $1,464.28 by controlled pain intensity and placebo showed $2,866.20 by controlled pain intensity.

conclusionsThe studies were considered to have moderate quality of evidence. Laser-treated groups had painful symptoms improvement that was superior to the control group and photobiomodulation was more cost-effective than placebo in patients with TMD and myofascial pain.

Identifiers

PMID34306537
PMCPMC8291152
OpenAlexW3184363537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.