Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34306528›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2021

Effect of application time and concentration of silver diamine fluoride on the enamel remineralization.

Marília-Franco Punhagui, Eduardo-Inocente Jussiani, Avacir-Casanova Andrello, Jaqueline-Costa Favaro, Ricardo-Danil Guiraldo, Murilo-Baena Lopes, Sandrine-Bittencourt Berger

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marília-Franco PunhaguiState University of Londrina (UNOPAR), Department of Oral Medicine and Pediatric Dentistry, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Eduardo-Inocente JussianiState University of Londrina (UEL), Department of Physics, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Avacir-Casanova AndrelloState University of Londrina (UEL), Department of Physics, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Jaqueline-Costa FavaroUniversity of North Parana (UNOPAR), Department of Restorative Dentistry, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Ricardo-Danil GuiraldoUniversity of North Parana (UNOPAR), Department of Restorative Dentistry, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Murilo-Baena LopesUniversity of North Parana (UNOPAR), Department of Restorative Dentistry, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Sandrine-Bittencourt BergerUniversity of North Parana (UNOPAR), Department of Restorative Dentistry, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Universidade Norte do Paraná · BRUniversidade Estadual de Londrina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSilver diamine fluoride has attracted attention because of its clinical success in arresting dental caries. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different application times and concentrations of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) on deciduous tooth enamel remineralization. MATERIAL AND

methodsBlocks of deciduous tooth enamel were categorized into six groups of 11 each: 2 control groups: intact enamel, and demineralized enamel; 38% SDF and 30% SDF which were subdivided according to application times (1 and 3 min). The microhardness of samples was determined, and all groups except the intact enamel group were subjected to pH cycling to produce initial carious lesions. The 38% and 30% SDF solutions were applied to the enamel for 1 or 3 min. After pH cycling and SDF treatments, the microhardness was again determined. Samples were sectioned to evaluate the cross-sectional microhardness. Furthermore, internal porosity of the samples was examined using micro-CT. Data were statistically analyzed by analysis of variance followed by Tukey's test, and linear regression analyses were performed.

resultsThere was no difference in enamel remineralization based on surface and cross-sectional microhardness. The 30% SDF solution applied for 3 min promoted significantly less pores than the other groups.

conclusionsThe 1-min application time promoted enamel remineralization regardless of the SDF concentration (30% or 38%).

Identifiers

PMID34306528
PMCPMC8291156
OpenAlexW3186438601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.