The clinical efficacy and safety of different biliary drainages in malignant obstructive jaundice treatment.

To study the clinical efficacy and safety of different biliary drainages in malignant obstructive jaundice (MOJ) treatment.

methods69 patients with MOJ admitted to our hospital from October 2016 to March 2019 were recruited as the study cohort and divided into an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography group (the ERCP group, n=38) and a percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage group (the PTCD group, n=31) according to the different drainage approaches each patient underwent. We compared the two groups' hepatic function indexes (total serum bilirubin (TB), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST)), their immune cells (CD3+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells), surgical success rates, jaundice reduction response rates, and postoperative complications.

resultsThe surgical success rates and the jaundice reduction response rates were similar in the two groups (P > 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed in the hepatic function indexes or in the immune cells before and after treatment in the two groups (all P > 0.05). Moreover, all the indexes we measured were lower post-treatment than they were pre-treatment (TB, ALT, AST, and CD8+) except for the CD3+ and CD4+ levels (all P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the ERCP group was significantly lower than the incidence in the PTCD group (P < 0.05).

conclusionBoth ERCP and PTCD can contribute to better clinical results in the treatment of MOJ, relieve obstructions effectively, improve hepatic function, and enhance immune function, but there are fewer complications after ERCP.