Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34306501›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021

The effect of multi-supportive nursing on the postoperative rehabilitation of breast cancer patients.

Xiaoxiao Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Role of Rehabilitation Nurses in Empowering Mastectomised Women for Self-Care: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Xiaoxiao TangMedical Oncology 1, Xingtai People's Hospital Xingtai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the effect of multi-supportive nursing on the postoperative rehabilitation of breast cancer (BC) patients.

methodsA total of 96 BC patients who underwent radical mastectomies in our hospital from January 2014 to January 2017 were recruited as the study cohort. The patients were equally divided into a regular group and a research group, with 48 cases in each group. The regular group underwent conventional postoperative nursing, and the research group underwent multi-supportive nursing. We compared the changes in the two groups of patients' quality of life, their psychological states, and their upper limb function before and after the nursing. The nursing satisfaction and the two groups' survival times were also analyzed after the 3-year follow-up.

resultsThe Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) and the Connor- Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) subitem scores and the activity angles of the involved shoulder joints in the two groups were increased after the nursing and were better in the research group (all P < 0.05). The involved upper limb lymphedema scores in the two groups were reduced after the nursing and the research group showed a lower level than the regular group (all P < 0.05). The nursing satisfaction was higher in the research group compared with the regular group (97.92% vs. 85.42%, P < 0.05). During the 3-year follow-up, the Progression Free Survival (PFS) in the research group was longer than it was in the regular group (P < 0.05).

conclusionMulti-supportive nursing plays a positive role in promoting patients' postoperative rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Breast cancercentrosome-related kinase 2extracellular regulatory protein kinase 2galectin-3nursingpostoperative rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID34306501
PMCPMC8290794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.