ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Application value of NRS2002 and PG-SGA in nutritional assessment for patients with cervical cancer surgery.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical significance of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in gastric cancer patients: A meta-analysis of 9,764 participants.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Pooled it
- Non-Inferiority of a Ready-to-Drink Enteral Formula on Nutritional Status in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Nutrients · 2026Trial
- Nutritional Risk Screening in Gynaecologic Oncology Surgery: Importance, Scoring Systems, Recommendations and Practical Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Development and internal-external validation of a nomogram for predicting postoperative 30-day malnutrition risk in cervical cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- Building a risk prediction model for anastomotic leakage postoperative low rectal cancer based on Lasso-Logistic regression.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Analysis of nutritional risk, skeletal muscle depletion, and lipid metabolism phenotype in acute radiation enteritis.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023Article
- The Relationship between Nutritional Risk and the Most Common Chronic Diseases in Hospitalized Geriatric Population from Central Poland.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Prognostic values of the prognostic nutritional index, geriatric nutritional risk index, and systemic inflammatory indexes in patients with stage IIB-III cervical cancer receiving radiotherapy.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Preoperative Nutritional Risk Assessment for Predicting Complications after Radical Cystectomy plus Urinary Diversion for Bladder Cancer.Emergency medicine international · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study explored and analyzed the application value of nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS2002) and patient-generated subjective nutrition assessment (PG-SGA) in nutritional assessment for patients with cervical cancer surgery.
methodsA total of 165 cervical cancer patients that received elective cervical cancer surgery from February 2017 to December 2019 were chosen as the research subjects. NRS 2002 and PG-SGA were employed to evaluate the nutritional status of patients, and detect their nutrition-related laboratory examination indexes. By using albumin (ALB)≤30 g/L as the criterion of malnutrition, the accuracy of NRS2002 and PG-SGA in evaluating the nutritional status of patients was analyzed.
resultsThe differences between scores of NRS2002 and PG-SGA in age, BMI, tumor stage, pelvic lymph node metastasis were statistically significant (
conclusionBoth NRS2002 and PG-SGA are suitable for preoperative nutritional risk screening of patients with cervical cancer surgery. PG-SGA has a higher positive rate but poor time requirement than that of RS2002. Therefore, clinicians can choose the appropriate tool on the basis of an individual patient's situation for nutritional assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34306480PMC8290634W3185990397What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.