ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Early and late outcomes of non-total aortic arch replacement for repair of acute Stanford Type A aortic dissection.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors and prognosis of postoperative hepatic dysfunction after Stanford type A aortic dissection repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of Post-operative Outcomes Between Direct Axillary Artery Cannulation and Side-Graft Axillary Artery Cannulation in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Surgical choice for the treatment of partial intestinal ischemic necrosis caused by acute type a aortic dissection combined with malperfusion of superior mesenteric artery.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Review
- Study on risk factors and treatment strategies of hypoxemia after acute type a aortic dissection surgery.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study evaluated the early and late outcomes of non-total aortic arch replacement for acute Stanford A aortic dissection.
methods131 cases of acute Stanford Type A aortic dissection with no rupture admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to December 2019 were selected for non-total aortic arch replacement. According to different surgical methods, 51 patients with tear-oriented ascending/hemiarch replacement were included in Group A, and 80 patients who underwent total arch replacement surgery were enrolled in Group B. The perioperative indicators, 30-day mortality rate, and the incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups, and the survival rate of patients were compared by follow-up after discharge.
resultsThe cardiopulmonary bypass time, cardiac perfusion time, invasive ventilation and ICU hospitalization in Group A were critically shorter than those in Group B (
conclusionFor acute Stanford type A aortic dissection without rupture in aortic arch, the non-total aortic arch replacement has simple surgical method with high perioperative safety and long-term efficacy that similar to total arch replacement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34306462PMC8290664W3186660831What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.