ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
The clinical study of CBCT imaging technology in the restoration of upper anterior teeth of the elderly.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate and analyze the clinical effect of CBCT imaging technology on the restoration of upper anterior teeth of the elderly.
methods36 elderly patients with upper anterior teeth loss in our hospital from January 2018 to January 2020 were selected for implant restoration. Patients were equally randomized into a curved tomographic restoration group (TR group) and a CBCT restoration group (CR group). Patients in the two groups underwent traditional implant restoration. Then we compared and analyzed the implant migration, the adjustment time of first wearing, and the success rate of axial gingival recession and restoration satisfaction of patients in the two groups.
resultsThe neck offset and the root offset of the implants in the CR group was (0.77±0.15) mm and (0.83±0.17) mm, respectively, which were significantly lower than (1.25±0.27) mm and (1.73±0.29) mm in the TR group (t=6.593, t=11.359, all P<0.01). The initial wearing adjustment time of patients in the CR group [(8.73±1.94) min] was significantly less than (18.79±4.85) min in the TR group (t=8.171, P<0.01); the CR group had a significantly higher success rate of axial gingival recession as compared to the CR group (94.44% vs 61.11%, χ
conclusionThe CBCT imaging technology has a significant clinical effect on the restoration of the upper anterior teeth of the elderly, which effectively reduces the deviation of implant placement, shorten the adjustment time of their initial wearing, and greatly improves the success rate of axial gingival recession, effectively guarantees the long-term stability and aesthetics of dental implant restoration, and significantly enhances the satisfaction of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34306458PMC8290702W3185512045What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.