ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Application of systematic nursing in patients with maniac access of bipolar disorder and its impact on treatment compliance and quality of life.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the application of systematic nursing in patients with maniac access of bipolar disorder and its impact on treatment compliance and quality of life.
methodsUsing a random number table method, 91 patients with manic episodes of bipolar disorder were divided into a control group (n=46, received conventional nursing) and an observation group (n=45, combined with systematic care including health education, ward environment, mental health nursing, and rehabilitation training, mental state assessment and family and social support). The treatment compliance of Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS), the manic state of Bech-Rafaelsdn Mania Rating Scale (BRMS), the mental state of Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMA) and Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), the quality of life of Generic Quality of Life Inventory-74 (GQOLI-74), the self-efficacy of Strategies Used by Patients to Promote Health (SUPPH), and the cognitive function of the Chinese Version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Revised (WAIS-RC) before and 3 months after intervention were compared.
resultsAfter intervention, the BRMS scores of the patients in both groups were significantly decreased, and those in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (all P<0.05). After intervention, the MMAS scores of patients in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). After intervention, the scores of GQOLI-74, SUPPH and WAIS-RC in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (all P<0.05). After intervention, the scores of HAMA and HAMD in both groups decreased, and those in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (all P<0.05).
conclusionSystematic nursing for patients with maniac access of bipolar disorder can clearly relieve their bad moods, control their manic state, and improve their self-efficacy, quality of life and treatment compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34306445PMC8290772W3184547709What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.