ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Clinical effect of warm needle penetration in treating knee osteoarthritis.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveOur aim was to explore the clinical effect of warm needle penetration in treating knee osteoarthritis.
methodsWe randomly divided 118 patients with knee osteoarthritis into the observation group (n=59) and the control group (n=59). The observation group was treated with warm needle penetration combined with western medicine therapy, and the control group was only given western medicine therapy. The clinical effective rate, Visual analogue scale pain score, knee joint score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index and subjective satisfaction were observed and compared between the two groups.
resultsThe clinical effective rate, knee joint score and subjective satisfaction rate were higher (all P<0.05), while the Visual analogue scale pain score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis indices score were lower in the observation group than in the control group (both P<0.05).
conclusionWarm needle penetration can ameliorate the efficiency of treatment, reduce pain, and improve the range of knee joint motion and subjective satisfaction of patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34306424PMC8290696W3186166137What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.