ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Investigation of the value of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and coronary artery lesions in prognosis of percutaneous coronary intervention patients.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of cardiovascular risk using smartwatch-measured pulse wave velocity in China: a nationwide cross-sectional study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Long-term prognostic implications of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Revascularization Strategies in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Impact of Spirometrically Confirmed Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Arterial Stiffness and Surfactant Protein D After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. The CATEPOC Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the value of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (CFPWV) and coronary artery lesions in assessing prognosis of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients.
methodsA total of 300 PCI patients admitted to our hospital were selected as study subjects, and were divided into Group A (0-13 m/s, n=180) and Group B (> 13 m/s, n=120) in accordance with different carotid-femoral pulse wave velocities (CFPWVs). Coronary artery lesions, incidence rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at different stages, and differences in the indexes of cardiac function were compared between the two groups.
resultsCompared to Group A, Group B had more severe coronary artery lesions and higher incidence rates of postoperative complications and MACE during hospital stay and 2-year follow-up (
conclusionCFPEV, exhibits value in assessing the prognosis of PCI patients, and can effectively predict the postoperative incidence of MACE, which is conducive to the establishment of subsequent regimens. Therefore, CFPEV is worthy of clinical promotion and implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34306408PMC8290781W3183373194What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.