Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34306379›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021

An analysis of the implementation effects of new paths and methods of occupational ethics education for medical students in higher vocational colleges.

Lin Wen, Zhihong Luo, Lihua Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lin WenDepartment of Ideological and Political Education, Jiangxi Health Vocational College Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Zhihong LuoDepartment of Stomatology, Jiangxi Health Vocational College Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Lihua CaiThe Office of Party and Government, Jiangxi Health Vocational College Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the implementation effects of new paths and methods of occupational ethics education for medical students in higher vocational colleges.

methodsA total of 668 students in higher vocational colleges were selected as the study subjects, and divided into traditional group (n=349) and innovative group (n=319) in accordance with their grades. The data pertaining to the students' views on the educational model of medical and occupational ethics, occupational passion, spirit of occupational risk, occupational ethics and codes, and doctor-patient rights and obligations and communication abilities and skills in the two groups were compared, so as to explore the influences of new paths and methods of occupational ethics education on the occupational ethics of medical students in higher vocational colleges.

resultsThe study results showed that the innovative group was significantly superior to the traditional group in the satisfaction with the courses of occupational ethics, pedagogical effects, occupational dedication and passion, doctor-patient communication ability, the fulfillment of doctor-patient rights and obligations, and the cognition of occupational ethics and codes (

conclusionThe implementation of innovative methods of occupational ethics education for medical students in higher vocational colleges can produce significant feedback effects. The improved teachers' abilities and pedagogical methods, innovative teaching approaches and optimized curriculum can effectively improve the occupational ethics of medical students in higher vocational colleges.

Indexed as

educational methodsHigher vocational collegesmedical and occupational ethicsnew paths

Identifiers

PMID34306379
PMCPMC8290793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.