ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Application effect of continuous quality improvement measures on patient satisfaction and quality of life in gynecological nursing.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evidence-based nursing interventions in hepatocellular carcinoma care.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- A scoping review of continuous quality improvement in healthcare system: conceptualization, models and tools, barriers and facilitators, and impact.BMC health services research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the application effect of continuous quality improvement (CQI) measures on patient satisfaction and quality of life in gynecological nursing.
methodsA total of 183 gynecology patients in our hospital were randomly selected and divided into the control group (n=90) and the observation group (n=93). Patients in the control group were given routine nursing, and those in the observation group were given CQI nursing. Treatment satisfaction and quality of life of the patients were compared between the two groups.
resultsThe scores of nursing effect, nursing skill, nursing level and nursing attitude and the total score of nursing quality showed a significant difference between the two groups (
conclusionCQI measures can optimize care quality management, improve the quality of clinical gynecological nursing, reduce nursing defects and improve both the maternal and newborn status, thus increasing patient satisfaction and improving quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34306378PMC8290808What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.