ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2021
Clinical significance of combined detection of anti-Mullerian hormone and follicular output rate in women of late reproductive age.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Nomogram based on clinical and laboratory characteristics of euploid embryos using the data in PGT-A: a euploid-prediction model.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study was designed to explore the clinical significance of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) combined with follicular output rate (FORT) in women of late reproductive age.
methodsA total of 258 women (age range: 35-45 years old) who underwent pre-pregnancy examination in our hospital were collected as the research group (RG), among whom 184 were treated with
resultsCompared with the CG, AMH was decreased statistically in the RG (P<0.05). AMH was statistically higher in the regular menstrual group than in the menstrual disorder group (P<0.05), and FORT was statistically higher in the pregnancy group in comparison with the non-pregnancy group (P<0.05). AMH decreased with age (P<0.05), while FORT did not correlate with any notable difference among the three subgroups (P>0.05). High, medium and low AMH groups showed no significant difference in the number of retrieved oocytes and transplantable embryos, as well as FORT (P<0.05). A lower AMH level, was correlated with fewer number of retrieved oocytes and transplantable embryos, and higher the FORT level. Significant differences were present among the high, middle and low FORT groups regarding the number of retrieved oocytes and transplantable embryos, the clinical pregnancy rate and AMH level (P<0.05). The lower the level of FORT was, the less the number of retrieved oocytes and transplantable embryos was, the lower clinical pregnancy rate was, and the higher the AMH level was.
conclusionsAMH decreases gradually in women with an increase of age, and FORT can effectively predict pregnancy outcome. AMH detection combined FORT is of great significance in predicting the ovarian reserve function in women of late reproductive age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34306366PMC8290787W3185555556What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.