Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34306326›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of translational research2021

Diagnosis, epidemiology and management of serrated polyposis syndrome: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Fotios S Fousekis, Ioannis V Mitselos, Dimitrios K Christodoulou

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Novel Genetic Causes of Gastrointestinal Polyposis Syndromes.The application of clinical genetics · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fotios S FousekisDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Health Sciences, University Hospital of Ioannina, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ioannina Ioannina, Greece.
Ioannis V MitselosDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Health Sciences, University Hospital of Ioannina, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ioannina Ioannina, Greece.
Dimitrios K ChristodoulouDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Health Sciences, University Hospital of Ioannina, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ioannina Ioannina, Greece.
University Hospital of Ioannina · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serrated polyp associated colorectal cancer (CRC) develops from an alternative mechanism of colorectal carcinogenesis and accounts for 10-15% of all CRC. Serrated polyposis syndrome (SPS) occurs infrequently and is characterized by the occurrence of multiple serrated polyps (hyperplastic polyps, sessile serrated lesions and traditional serrated adenomas) throughout the colon and/or rectum and has been strongly associated with development of CRC. However, SPS is frequently unrecognized, due to application failure of the WHO criteria regarding diagnosis and/or missed serrated polyps during endoscopy. The management of SPS requires surveillance at regular intervals and removal of large serrated polyps. Endoscopic resection suitability and technique depends on lesion size and the endoscopist's experience. In this manuscript, we present an update regarding SPS epidemiology, molecular characteristics, management, surveillance strategies and endoscopic resection techniques.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerSerrated polyposis syndromesessile serrated lesionssurveillance

Identifiers

PMID34306326
PMCPMC8290820
OpenAlexW3184261146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.