Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34306179›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutical and healthcare marketing2020

A crossed-disciplinary evaluation of parental perceptions surrounding pediatric non-invasive brain stimulation research.

Michael Behan, Tanjila Nawshin, Samuel Nemanich, Jesse Kowalski, Ellen Sutter, Sunday Francis, Janet Dubinsky, Rebecca Freese, Kyle Rudser, Bernadette Gillick

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of pharmaceutical and healthcare marketing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael BehanDepartment of Marketing, Winona State University, Winona, Minnesota, USA.
Tanjila NawshinDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Samuel NemanichDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Jesse KowalskiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Ellen SutterDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Sunday FrancisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Janet DubinskyDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Rebecca FreeseClinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Kyle RudserClinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Bernadette GillickDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
University of Minnesota · USSouthern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute · USWinona State University · US

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
Using Computation to Achieve Breakthroughs in NeuroscienceT32MH115886 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI REDISH, A DAVID · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
Novel Neuromodulatory Intervention in the Rehabilitation of Pediatric HemiparesisK01HD078484 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI GILLICK, BERNADETTE THERESE · 2014 to 2018
$654k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD078484NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH115886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE –: Recruitment for pediatric non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) studies is often challenged by low enrollment. Understanding parental perceptions regarding NIBS is crucial to develop new communication strategies to increase enrollment. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH –: Integrating a crossed-disciplinary approach, the authors conducted a survey at the 2018 Minnesota State Fair querying the perception of risk and preferences of current and future parents associated with pediatric NIBS research. The survey consisted of 28 closed-text questions including demographics, photographs portraying NIBS, terminologies and factors related to NIBS studies. FINDINGS –: Complete surveys were analyzed from 622 parent participants. A significant number of participants (42.8%) perceived the photographs of NIBS as "risky." Additionally, 65.43% perceived the term "Non-invasive brain therapy" as not risky, a word combination not currently being used when recruiting potential participants. Over 90% (561/622) of participants chose the photograph of child-friendly MRI suite. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS –: Although this survey identified aspects crucial in recruitment for pediatric NIBS research, there were limitations. For example, the authors did not record the sex or demographic distribution (e.g. rural versus urban setting) of the participants. These factors may also influence recruitment messaging. ORIGINALITY/VALUE –: For important medical research to impact and improve the lives of the potential remedies, participation by the public in clinical trials is necessary. Often the general public perceives the trials as risky as a result of poor marketing communication recruitment material. This study sought to be understood if how the message is encoded has an impact on the decoding by the receiver.

Indexed as

Clinical trial recruitmentEnrollmentMarketing communicationNon-invasive brain stimulationParentPediatricPerception

Identifiers

PMID34306179
PMCPMC8301229
OpenAlexW3082533493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.