Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34305998›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021

Why and How to Switch to Genomic Selection: Lessons From Plant and Animal Breeding Experience.

R2D2 Consortium, Aline Fugeray-Scarbel, Catherine Bastien, Mathilde Dupont-Nivet, Stéphane Lemarié

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Heterogeneity of Variances in Milk Yield in Murrah Buffaloes.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genetic gains in IRRI's rice salinity breeding and elite panel development as a future breeding resource.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Genomic selection in tropical perennial crops and plantation trees: a review.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R2D2 Consortium
Aline Fugeray-ScarbelUniversité Grenoble Alpes, INRAE, CNRS, Grenoble INP, GAEL, Grenoble, France.
Catherine BastienINRAE, BioForA, Orléans, France.
Mathilde Dupont-NivetUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, GABI, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Stéphane LemariéUniversité Grenoble Alpes, INRAE, CNRS, Grenoble INP, GAEL, Grenoble, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study is a transversal analysis of the interest in genomic selection for plant and animal species. It focuses on the arguments that may convince breeders to switch to genomic selection. The arguments are classified into three different "bricks." The first brick considers the addition of genotyping to improve the accuracy of the prediction of breeding values. The second consists of saving costs and/or shortening the breeding cycle by replacing all or a portion of the phenotyping effort with genotyping. The third concerns population management to improve the choice of parents to either optimize crossbreeding or maintain genetic diversity. We analyse the relevance of these different bricks for a wide range of animal and plant species and sought to explain the differences between species according to their biological specificities and the organization of breeding programs.

Indexed as

breeder’s equationbreeding organizationbreeding programduration of breeding cycleMendelian samplingprediction accuracyselection costsselection intensity

Identifiers

PMID34305998
PMCPMC8301370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.