ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021
Genomic Predictions With Nonadditive Effects Improved Estimates of Additive Effects and Predictions of Total Genetic Values in
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- 2NPLGBM: a genomic model that merges the strengths of classical and machine learning methods in genomic prediction.Plant methods · 2026Article
- Dissecting fruit weight and quality traits in Australian passion fruit through genetic linkage mapping and QTL analysis.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Multivariate models improve accuracy of genomic prediction for spring frost tolerance in Norway spruce.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Quantifying genetic and genotypic gain gaps in Eucalyptus: the hidden cost of ignoring inbreeding and dominance.Heredity · 2025Article
- Genomic Prediction and Heritability Estimation for Daughter Pregnancy Rate in U.S. Holstein Cows Using SNP, Epistasis and Haplotype Effects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Genomic dissection of additive and non-additive genetic effects and genomic prediction in an open-pollinated family test of Japanese larch.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Genomic selection in forest trees comes to life: unraveling its potential in an advanced four-generationFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Comparison of the Accuracy of Epistasis and Haplotype Models for Genomic Prediction of Seven Human Phenotypes.Biomolecules · 2023Article
- Pervasive under-dominance in gene expression underlying emergent growth trajectories in Arabidopsis thaliana hybrids.Genome biology · 2023Article
- PyAGH: a python package to fast construct kinship matrices based on different levels of omic data.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Increasing genomic prediction accuracy for unphenotyped full-sib families by modeling additive and dominance effects with large datasets in white spruce.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Harnessing tree-ring phenotypes to disentangle gene by environment interactions and their climate dependencies in a circum-Mediterranean pine.Annals of botany · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic selection study (GS) focusing on nonadditive genetic effects of dominance and the first order of epistatic effects, in a full-sib family population of 695 Scots pine (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.