Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34305960›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021

Evolvability of Drought Response in Four Native and Non-native Conifers: Opportunities for Forest and Genetic Resource Management in Europe.

Silvio Schueler, Jan-Peter George, Sandra Karanitsch-Ackerl, Konrad Mayer, Raphael Thomas Klumpp, Michael Grabner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Population structure limits the use of genomic data for predicting phenotypes and managing genetic resources in forest trees.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Silvio SchuelerDepartment of Forest Growth, Silviculture and Genetics, Austrian Research Centre for Forests BFW, Vienna, Austria.
Jan-Peter GeorgeDepartment of Forest Growth, Silviculture and Genetics, Austrian Research Centre for Forests BFW, Vienna, Austria.
Sandra Karanitsch-AckerlDepartment of Material Sciences and Process Engineering, Institute of Wood Technology and Renewable Resources, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Tulln an der Donau, Austria.
Konrad MayerDepartment of Material Sciences and Process Engineering, Institute of Wood Technology and Renewable Resources, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Tulln an der Donau, Austria.
Raphael Thomas KlumppDepartment of Forest- and Soil Sciences, Institute of Silviculture, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria.
Michael GrabnerDepartment of Material Sciences and Process Engineering, Institute of Wood Technology and Renewable Resources, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Tulln an der Donau, Austria.
BOKU University · ATAustrian Research Centre for Forests · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraspecific genetic variation in drought response is expected to play an important role in determining the persistence of tree populations in global change as it (1) allows for spontaneous selection and local adaptation of tree populations, (2) supports assisted seed transfer of less-drought-sensitive provenance, and (3) enables the integration of drought-sensitivity traits into tree breeding. Estimating the potential of such adaptation options requires quantitative genetic knowledge of drought sensitivity across significant parts of species distributions and a comparative assessment of genetic variation within economically and ecologically important tree species. We quantified genetic variation within and among populations of four conifers growing within common garden experiments in the drought-prone eastern Austria. This region experienced three strong drought periods between 1980 and 2010 that resulted in significant reductions in radial growth. Among the four tested species, Douglas-fir revealed the highest resistance during drought and silver fir the best recovery after drought, while European larch and Norway spruce showed the lowest resistance. High genetic variation among populations and phenotypic stability across all three drought events was found for Norway spruce and silver fir, but not for the other species. Heritability and evolvability of drought traits, both approximated

Indexed as

Abies albaassisted migration and gene flowcoefficient of additive genetic variationLarix deciduaPicea abiesPseudotsuga menziesiirepeatabilitytree breeding and improvement

Identifiers

PMID34305960
PMCPMC8295755
OpenAlexW3178457404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.