Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34305891›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2021

Impact of Sex in the Efficacy of Perioperative Desensitization Procedures in Heart Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Lee S Nguyen, Joe-Elie Salem, Marie-Cécile Bories, Guillaume Coutance, Julien Amour, Adrien Bougle, Caroline Suberbielle, Vissal-David Kheav, Maryvonnick Carmagnat, Philippe Rouvier and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Desensitization Strategies in Immunized Heart Transplant Recipients.European surgical research. Europaische chirurgische Forschung. Recherches chirurgicales europeennes · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Lee S NguyenSorbonne Université, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, AP.HP.6 Pitie-Salpetriere, Paris, France.
Joe-Elie SalemSorbonne Université, Clinical Investigations Center, AP.HP.6, INSERM, Paris, France.
Marie-Cécile BoriesSorbonne Université, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, AP.HP.6 Pitie-Salpetriere, Paris, France.
Guillaume CoutanceSorbonne Université, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, AP.HP.6 Pitie-Salpetriere, Paris, France.
Julien AmourJacques Cartier Private Hospital, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Massy, France.
Adrien BougleSorbonne Université, Department of Anesthesiology, AP.HP.6 Pitie-Salpetriere, Paris, France.
Caroline SuberbielleSaint-Louis Hospital, Immunology Department, Paris, France.
Vissal-David KheavSaint-Louis Hospital, Immunology Department, Paris, France.
Maryvonnick CarmagnatSaint-Louis Hospital, Immunology Department, Paris, France.
Philippe RouvierSorbonne Université, Department of Anatomopathology, AP.HP.6 Pitie-Salpetriere, Paris, France.
Matthias KirschDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Shaida VarnousSorbonne Université, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, AP.HP.6 Pitie-Salpetriere, Paris, France.
Pascal LeprinceSorbonne Université, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, AP.HP.6 Pitie-Salpetriere, Paris, France.
Samir SahebSorbonne Université, service d'hémobiologie, AP.HP.6 Pitie-Salpetriere, Paris, France.
Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital · FRSorbonne Université · FRHôpital Saint-Louis · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRHôpital Privé Jacques Cartier · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sensitized patients, i.e. recipients with preformed donor-specific HLA antibodies (pfDSA), are at high-risk of developing antibody-mediated rejections (AMR) and dying after heart transplantation (HTx). Perioperative desensitization procedures are associated with better outcomes but can cause sensitization, which may influence their efficacy. Methods: In sensitized patients (pfDSA>1000 mean immunofluorescence (MFI) units), we assessed the effect of perioperative desensitization by comparing treated patients to a historical control cohort. Multivariable survival analyses were performed on the time to main outcome, a composite of death and biopsy-proven AMR with 5-year follow-up. Results: The study included 68 patients: 31 control and 37 treated patients. There was no difference in preoperative variables between the two groups, including cumulative pfDSA [4026 (1788;8725) Conclusion: Perioperative desensitization was associated with fewer AMR and deaths after HTx, and efficacy was more pronounced in men than women.

Indexed as

Desensitization, ImmunologicHeart TransplantationPerioperative CareAdultBiomarkersBiopsyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGraft RejectionHLA AntigensHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyPrognosisBiomarkersHLA AntigensImmunosuppressive Agentsantibody mediated allograft rejectiondesensitizationgender inequalitiesheart transplantsex influence

Identifiers

PMID34305891
PMCPMC8292826
OpenAlexW3180128527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.