Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34305586›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2021

An Ethnobotanical Study of Medicinal Plants in Mersin (Turkey).

Gizem Emre, Ahmet Dogan, Mehmet Zeki Haznedaroglu, Ismail Senkardes, Mahmut Ulger, Aysen Satiroglu, Berivan Can Emmez, Osman Tugay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Antimutagenic and Antigenotoxic Effects ofTurkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Untargeted Metabolomic and Phytochemical Profiling ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Lords-and-Ladies (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. An Ethnobotanical Study in Kırşehir (Türkiye).Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gizem EmreDepartment of Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Marmara University, Basibuyuk-Istanbul, Turkey.
Ahmet DoganDepartment of Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Marmara University, Basibuyuk-Istanbul, Turkey.
Mehmet Zeki HaznedarogluDepartment of Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Cigli-Izmir, Turkey.
Ismail SenkardesDepartment of Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Marmara University, Basibuyuk-Istanbul, Turkey.
Mahmut UlgerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mersin University, Yenisehir-Mersin, Turkey.
Aysen SatirogluDepartment of Sociology, Faculty of Letters, Istanbul University, Fatih-Istanbul, Turkey.
Berivan Can EmmezDepartment of Turkish Language and Literature, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Adana Alparslan Turkes University, Adana, Turkey.
Osman TugayDepartment of Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Selcuk University, Selcuklu-Konya, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This comprehensive ethnobotanical study carried out in Mersin province, which is located in the southern part of Anatolia, east of the Mediterranean Sea, compiles details on plants used in folk medicine and ethnopharmacological information obtained through face-to-face interviews. The aim was to collect and identify plants used for therapeutic purposes by local people and to record information on traditional herbal medicine. Plant specimens were collected in numerous excursions. Additionally, informant consensus factor and use value (UV) were calculated for information gathered. This study identifies 93 plant taxa belonging to 43 families and records their usage in folk medicine; 83 taxa are wild and the remaining 10 are cultivated. The most commonly used plants belong to Lamiaceae, representing 15.0% of the total, while the Rosaceae, Malvaceae, Hypericaceae, Asteraceae and Cupressaceae families each represented another 5.4%. As a result of this investigation, we determine 189 medicinal usages of 93 taxa. The UV values indicate that the most important medicine plants are

Indexed as

Ethnobotanyfolk medicinal plantsMersintraditional knowledgeTurkey

Identifiers

PMID34305586
PMCPMC8294455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.