ArticleGerontechnology : international journal on the fundamental aspects of technology to serve the ageing society2021
Use of in-home activity monitoring technologies in older adult veterans with mild cognitive impairment: The impact of attitudes and cognition.
Article in Gerontechnology : international journal on the fundamental aspects of technology to serve the ageing society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Examining Technology Perspectives of Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment: Scoping Review.JMIR aging · 2025Article
- Home-Based Digital Technologies to Support Aging-in-Place for Rural African American People With Alzheimer Disease and Their Care Partners: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- The mediating role of ICT learning confidence and technostress between executive functions and digital skills.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs researchers incorporate in-home technologies to identify and track changes in older adults' cognitive and daily functioning that could lead to early interventions, the attitudes of older adults across the continuum from normal cognitive aging to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) must be assessed to ensure technology adoption and adherence in each unique group.
objectiveThis exploratory pilot study incorporated both quantitative and qualitative approaches to examine mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and cognitively intact older adults' attitudes (i.e., usability, acceptability, digital readiness, barriers) and adherence to in-home technologies after undergoing 7 months of in-home activity monitoring.
methodParticipants were 30 older adult veterans who were classified as cognitively intact (n = 15) or having mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (n = 15) and participated in a longitudinal aging and technology study that monitored their physical activity and computer use.
resultsWhile MCI older adults endorsed reduced digital readiness (p =.041) and required more in-home technology maintenance visits (p =.041) from staff as compared to cognitively intact older adults, there was no difference in adherence to the study technology (p >.05). Usability and acceptability attitudes in the entire sample predicted adherence to the physical activity monitoring technology employed in the study (p =.008).
conclusionFindings highlight the potential gap between technology developers and older adult end users, and technologies designed specifically for older adults with MCI should be developed with direct input from older adults with MCI to promote usability and long-term adoption in this clinical population. Larger studies are needed to replicate and increase the generalizability of the current findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.