Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34305412›Full record

ReviewOrthopedic research and reviews2021

A Protocol to Systematic Radiographic Assessment of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Ahmed A Khalifa, Arun B Mullaji, Alaa M Mostafa, Osama A Farouk

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopedic research and reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05944679 (Prospective Randomized Study of the Clinical Utility to Follow-up Radiographs During the First Year of Knee Replacement Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05944679 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Randomized Study of the Clinical Utility to Follow-up Radiographs During the First Year of Knee Replacement Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorCorporacion Parc TauliRan2022 to 2024Enrolled200ConditionsProsthetic Knee SurgeryArmsNo Xray, Xray
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ahmed A KhalifaOrthopaedic Department, Qena Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-0710-6487
Arun B MullajiOrthopaedic Department, Breach Candy Hospital, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6622-7860
Alaa M MostafaOrthopaedic Department, Qena Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt.
Osama A FaroukOrthopaedic and Traumatology Department, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-3897-6485

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is considered one of the most successful procedures, however, a subset of patients are unsatisfied with the results, even with the introduction of new technologies and implant designs. Radiological assessment of TKA is still considered the most prevalent imaging modality for evaluating the knee joint pre-and postoperatively. Assessment of various angles and indices which could be measured in different radiographic views of the knee provides valuable information about the alignment of the entire limb and the individual prosthetic components, more so in the light of recent nuanced concepts of technique, alignment, and balance. This review article aims to present a comprehensive yet systematic approach to the most useful radiographic parameters for assessing the knee preoperatively and post-TKA by explaining the tools and techniques used for measuring various angles, indices and ratios in the coronal, sagittal and axial planes for diagnosis, preoperative planning, postoperative assessment, and routine follow-up. The protocol we followed in this review entailed first reporting the possible applications and software which could help in measuring these variables, then we mentioned the required series of knee radiographs. For the desired variables, we divided the assessment according to each plane, and in each, we reported the optimum position of the desired radiographic view followed by determining the axis and lines which will later form the desired angles to be measured; finally, we collected all the measurements in a table with the native knee values and the most accepted values after TKA.

Indexed as

arthroplastyassessmentknee radiographpostoperativereplacementtotal knee

Identifiers

PMID34305412
PMCPMC8294812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.