Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34305369›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychotherapy integration2020

Telepsychotherapy with Youth at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: Clinical Issues and Best Practices during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Joseph S DeLuca, Nicole D Andorko, Doha Chibani, Samantha Y Jay, Pamela J Rakhshan Rouhakhtar, Emily Petti, Mallory J Klaunig, Elizabeth C Thompson, Zachary B Millman, Kathleen M Connors and 16 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychotherapy integration, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Stakeholder views on mindfulness for youth at risk for psychosis.International journal of mental health nursing · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The Impact of Physicians' COVID-19 Pandemic Occupational Experiences on Mental Health.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph S DeLucaUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Baltimore, MD.
Nicole D AndorkoUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, Department of Psychology, Baltimore, MD.
Doha ChibaniUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, Department of Psychology, Baltimore, MD.
Samantha Y JayUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, Department of Psychology, Baltimore, MD.
Pamela J Rakhshan RouhakhtarUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, Department of Psychology, Baltimore, MD.
Emily PettiUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, Department of Psychology, Baltimore, MD.
Mallory J KlaunigUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, Department of Psychology, Baltimore, MD.
Elizabeth C ThompsonAlpert Medical School of Brown University, Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Providence, RI.
Zachary B MillmanMcLean Hospital, Belmont, MA.
Kathleen M ConnorsUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Baltimore, MD.
LeeAnn Akouri-ShanUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, Department of Psychology, Baltimore, MD.
John FitzgeraldUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, Department of Psychology, Baltimore, MD.
Samantha L RedmanUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, Department of Psychology, Baltimore, MD.
Caroline RoemerUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, Department of Psychology, Baltimore, MD.
Miranda A BridgwaterUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, Department of Psychology, Baltimore, MD.
Jordan E DeVylderFordham University Graduate School of Social Service, New York, NY.
Cheryl A KingUniversity of Michigan, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology, Ann Arbor, MI.
Steven C PittsUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, Department of Psychology, Baltimore, MD.
Shauna P ReinblattUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Baltimore, MD.
Heidi J WehringMaryland Psychiatric Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Kristin L BussellUniversity of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD.
Natalee SolomonMaryland Department of Health, Behavioral Health Administration, Transition-Aged Youth and Young Adult Services, Baltimore, MD.
Sarah M EdwardsUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Baltimore, MD.
Gloria M ReevesUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Baltimore, MD.
Robert W BuchananMaryland Psychiatric Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Jason SchiffmanUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, Department of Psychology, Baltimore, MD.
University of Maryland, Baltimore County · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USBrown University · USFordham University · USMaryland Department of Health · USMcLean Hospital · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

A Treatment Engagement Protocol to Improve Follow-Up Care for Psychiatrically Hospitalized Adolescents at Clinical High Risk for PsychosisK23MH119211 · NIMH · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL · PI THOMPSON, ELIZABETH COURTNEY · 2020 to 2023
$787k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH119211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early detection and prevention of psychosis has become an international priority. Much of this work has focused on youth presenting with attenuated symptoms of psychosis-those at Clinical High Risk for psychosis (CHR)-given their elevated probability of developing the full disorder in subsequent years. Individuals at CHR may be prone to exacerbated psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic and its subsequent physical isolation measures, due to heightened stress sensitivity and comorbid mental health problems. Telepsychotherapy holds promise for reaching this population, especially during the current COVID-19 outbreak. However, there are limited evidence-based guidelines or interventions for use of telepsychotherapy with this population. In this paper, we review common clinical issues for individuals at CHR and how they might be exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic; best practices for treatment and adaptations for telepsychotherapy for individuals at CHR; and highlight real clinical issues that we are currently experiencing in a United States-based specialized CHR clinic as we conduct telepsychotherapy via videoconferencing. We conclude with questions for those in the field to contemplate, as well as potential challenges and benefits in using telepsychotherapy with individuals at CHR and their families.

Indexed as

Clinical high riskCOVID-19prodromepsychosistelepsychotherapy

Identifiers

PMID34305369
PMCPMC8297958
OpenAlexW3035134055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.