Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34305315›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurolinguistics2021

Simultaneously recorded subthalamic and cortical LFPs reveal different lexicality effects during reading aloud.

A Chrabaszcz, D Wang, W J Lipski, A Bush, D J Crammond, S Shaiman, M W Dickey, L L Holt, R S Turner, J A Fiez and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurolinguistics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

A ChrabaszczDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA, 15213.
D WangSchool of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 100084.
W J LipskiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA, 15213.
A BushBrain Modulation Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA, 02114.
D J CrammondDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA, 15213.
S ShaimanDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA, 15213.
M W DickeyDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA, 15213.
L L HoltDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, 15213.
R S TurnerDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA, 15213.
J A FiezDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA, 15213.
R M RichardsonBrain Modulation Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA, 02114.
University of Pittsburgh · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USNeurological Surgery · USCarnegie Mellon University · US

Funding

Subthalamic and corticosubthalamic coding of speech productionU01NS098969 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI RICHARDSON, ROBERT MARK · 2016 to 2018
$3.3M
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS098969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many language functions are traditionally assigned to cortical brain areas, leaving the contributions of subcortical structures to language processing largely unspecified. The present study examines a potential role of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in lexical processing, specifically, reading aloud of words (e.g., 'fate') and pseudowords (e.g., 'fape'). We recorded local field potentials simultaneously from the STN and the cortex (precentral, postcentral, and superior temporal gyri) of 13 people with Parkinson's disease undergoing awake deep brain stimulation and compared STN's lexicality-related neural activity with that of the cortex. Both STN and cortical activity demonstrated significant task-related modulations, but the lexicality effects were different in the two brain structures. In the STN, an increase in gamma band activity (31-70 Hz) was present in pseudoword trials compared to word trials during subjects' spoken response. In the cortex, a greater decrease in beta band activity (12-30 Hz) was observed for pseudowords in the precentral gyrus. Additionally, 11 individual cortical sites showed lexicality effects with varying temporal and topographic characteristics in the alpha and beta frequency bands. These findings suggest that the STN and the sampled cortical regions are involved differently in the processing of lexical distinctions.

Indexed as

Basal gangliaDeep brain stimulationElectrocorticography (ECoG)Lexical processingPseudowordsSubthalamic nucleus

Identifiers

PMID34305315
PMCPMC8294107
OpenAlexW3174626668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.