Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34305303›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment2021

Development of the COVID-19 Perinatal Perception Questionnaire (COVID19-PPQ).

Lianne P Hulsbosch, Myrthe G B M Boekhorst, Lotte Muskens, Eva S Potharst, Ivan Nyklíček, Victor J M Pop

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lianne P HulsboschCenter of Research in Psychological and Somatic Disorders (CoRPS), Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, P.O. BOX 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Myrthe G B M BoekhorstCenter of Research in Psychological and Somatic Disorders (CoRPS), Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, P.O. BOX 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Lotte MuskensCenter of Research in Psychological and Somatic Disorders (CoRPS), Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, P.O. BOX 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Eva S PotharstUvA Minds, academic outpatient (child and adolescent) treatment center of the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ivan NyklíčekCenter of Research in Psychological and Somatic Disorders (CoRPS), Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, P.O. BOX 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Victor J M PopCenter of Research in Psychological and Somatic Disorders (CoRPS), Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, P.O. BOX 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Tilburg University · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic affects the mental health status of perinatal women, which makes it important to gain insight into and to effectively measure specific stressors of the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, we aimed to develop a COVID-19 Perinatal Perception Questionnaire (COVID19-PPQ). In-depth interviews were conducted during the first national lockdown period with pregnant women, new mothers and perinatal healthcare professionals, resulting in (a) a 27-item pregnancy and (b) a 21-item postpartum scale. Explorative factor analyses (EFA) in sample Ia (N = 154) and Ib (N = 90), and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) in sample IIa (N = 113) and IIb (N = 81) were conducted to test the psychometric properties of both scales. For the pregnancy scale, EFA suggested a three-factor solution (risk of infection, contact, future), which was confirmed by CFA and resulted in a final nine-item scale. For the postpartum scale, a three-factor solution (first postpartum week, COVID-19 measures, fear for infection) was suggested by EFA and confirmed by CFA, resulting in a final ten-item scale. Symptoms of depression and pregnancy-specific distress were significantly correlated with the pregnancy (sub)scale(s), while symptoms of postpartum depression and anxiety showed significant correlations with the COVID-19 measures and fear for infection subscale. The COVID19-PPQ seems to be a valid instrument for assessment of perinatal COVID-19-related stress perception, showing adequate psychometric properties for both the pregnancy and postpartum scale. Future research should examine the use of this instrument in clinical practice during new episodes of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemicPerceptionPerinatalValidation

Identifiers

PMID34305303
PMCPMC8285281
OpenAlexW3184313375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.