Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34305278›Full record

ReviewMedical journal, Armed Forces India2021

Artificial intelligence in critical care: Its about time!

Rashmi Datta, Shalendra Singh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical journal, Armed Forces India, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. 21st century critical care medicine: An overview.World journal of critical care medicine · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rashmi DattaMG (Med), HQ Delhi Area, Delhi Cantt, India.
Shalendra SinghProfessor, Department of Anaesthesiology & Critical Care, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, most critical care information is not expressed automatically at a granular level, rather is continually assessed by overindulged Intensive Care Unit (ICU) staff. Furthermore, due to different confounding morbidities and the uniqueness of the ICU setting, it is difficult to protocolize treatment regimens in the ICU. In highly complex ICU setting where man and resource management becomes extremely challenging, definite advancements are required to implement Artificial Intelligence (AI) for prognosticating the course of the disease to aid in informed decision-making. AI is the intelligence of a computer or computer-supervised robot to execute a piece of work commonly associated with intelligent beings, wherein the machines go beyond the realms of normal information processing by adding the characteristics of learning, sound reasoning, and weighting of the inputs. AI recognizes circuitous, relational time-series blueprint within datasets and this reasoning of analysis transcends conventional threshold-based analysis adapted in ICU protocols. AI works on the principle of a more complex form of Machine Learning by Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). These information-processing paradigms use multidimensional arrays called tensors which aid in 'learning' and 'weighting' all the information made available to it, thereby converting normal machine learning into Deep Learning. Here, the use of AI for data mining in complex ICU settings for protocol formulation and temporal representation and reasoning is discussed.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCritical careIntensive care unit

Identifiers

PMID34305278
PMCPMC8282528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.